Really? It is where I'm sitting.Aus looking pretty grim
Shame it will never get coverage similar to Greta's boat trip
-
Just like this link
Strange; the fires are getting loads of news coverage as an apocalyptic event on my news feeds.
Merely quoting the facts is pretty scary.
There's a reason for that - people can get a 'feel' more easily for a single, comprehensible event such as (an albeit) large building burning down than a huge a global-scale catastrophe.
That, combined with the easier approach to take of depression and fatalism (I'm depressed and scared about at an almost inevitable slow planetary death, so I'll ignore it) means it gets a global *meh* until their home is flooded or caught in a bush fire or their country gets inundated with environmental refugees.
One thing I noticed on Facebook, Daily mail page is people on there seem to really dislike Greta. They say some quite nasty things about her.
Good. That means that she is getting through.One thing I noticed on Facebook, Daily mail page is people on there seem to really dislike Greta. They say some quite nasty things about her.
All true, except the cathedral fire had additional elements, I'd say. It's known that humans don't acknowledge distant threats with any urgency (such as death); what I'm wondering is whether that trait is enhanced with social media, with its endless distractions, along with a faction of denial. Imagining this occurred back in the day of TV and newspapers, would our general reaction be different?
Climate science denial seems to be very much a right wing thing IME, the more extreme the more the denial as religion/magical thinking comes into play too, e.g. very high levels of denial in religious red-neck areas of the USA.
Aus looking pretty grim
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-31/victoria-bushfire-mallacoota-residents-emergency/11833912
Shame it will never get coverage similar to Greta's boat trip