I think voters will do just that at the next GE.I think you need to distinguish between Labour (a political party made up of hundreds of MPs) and a handful of Labour MPs who might vote for Johnson's deal.
According to Letwin on Marr today the whole point of the amendment was to prevent a no deal. He said he would vote for the BJ deal as he did with Mays deals in the past.
I’m still in a state of shock and physical repulsion that Sky is unquestionably better on the detail and less biased than the BBC! I watch it as my default TV news now, topped up with C4 and Newsnight. I’ve all but given up on BBC News 24 and Politics Live.
I ordered it about a month ago now that Murdoch/Fox has nothing to do with it and have been quite impressed.
I’m just on Freeview, so I only get low-res for Sky News (which is annoyingly obvious on a 50” TV), so a true content vs. aesthetics decision against the HD-res BBC!
I’m just on Freeview, so I only get low-res for Sky News (which is annoyingly obvious on a 50” TV), so a true content vs. aesthetics decision against the HD-res BBC!
Last night's late evening news on BBC1 had Huw and Laura live from Westminster, which was understandable. The "other big news story of the day" from the studio was England beating Australia at rugby.I’m still in a state of shock and physical repulsion that Sky is unquestionably better on the detail and less biased than the BBC! I watch it as my default TV news now, topped up with C4 and Newsnight. I’ve all but given up on BBC News 24 and Politics Live.
What year !Gove adamant we're leaving by 31st.
According to Letwin on Marr today the whole point of the amendment was to prevent a no deal. He said he would vote for the BJ deal as he did with Mays deals in the past.
Good old impartial $ky:
Good old impartial $ky:
The BBC has been the Conservative propaganda agency for a few years now and the only thing I bother with is the Friday news quiz.
They’re bound by due impartiality rules, like all broadcasters in the UK. Without the rules British TV news would be like the British press. Nothing to do with people not being able to think for themselves, just an acknowledgement that billionaires with media empires at their disposal are capable of creating an absolutely toxic climate of opinion.Sky don't have to be totally impartial, same with any news channel you watch the content and decide for yourself what your opinion is.
(Unless of course you can't think for yourself and believe everything that comes out of the magic picture box like the 52%)
Sky don't have to be totally impartial, same with any news channel you watch the content and decide for yourself what your opinion is.
They’re bound by due impartiality rules, like all broadcasters in the UK. Without the rules British TV news would be like the British press. Nothing to do with people not being able to think for themselves, just an acknowledgement that billionaires with media empires at their disposal are capable of creating an absolutely toxic climate of opinion.