Somafunk
pfm Member
Missed it while reading an article about a scientist who got a whole orange stuck in his mouth.
I read that as well, to be fair to him that’s exactly the sort of stupid thing I would try.
Missed it while reading an article about a scientist who got a whole orange stuck in his mouth.
Sunak seemed very relaxed, probably because he knows he’s behind. However, the Sky audience seemed to favour him over Truss. There could be a final twist!
what stone has that little grifter crawled out from under?More comedy available - Matt Hancock is on Newsnight.
… & at what point do you think, that, say copper tape across the threshold and/or, perhaps a generous salting of the garden path - might be enough to prevent another Tory taking residence at no. 10?what stone has that little grifter crawled out from under?
More comedy available - Matt Hancock is on Newsnight.
Sunak seemed very relaxed, probably because he knows he’s behind. However, the Sky audience seemed to favour him over Truss. There could be a final twist!
Yet more selective quoting I see. If you read the entire post, you will see that what I was responding to, was in fact, gibberish. I was responding directly to the content of a post, unlike early all of the criticism of MMT, which is focussed on attacking the individual posters purely in personal terms. Some troll even started a thread that had no other purpose but to attack one of the most calm and considered posters here in entirely personal terms.Genuinely interested if, as is often remarked upon lately, the types of responses below constitute "ad-hom"?
Not looking for an argument here, but I see this type of reply pretty often and wonder if it simply leads to more of the same where some people take exception to it, and others brush it off.
Are all MP’s failures from the private sector or failures because that have failed to get a decent gig in the private sector?I wondered why Hancock is still an MP. And then I realised it's because he can't get any kind of decent gig in the private sector. That's the state of the Tories.
Yet more selective quoting I see. If you read the entire post, you will see that what I was responding to, was in fact, gibberish. I was responding directly to the content of a post, unlike early all of the criticism of MMT, which is focussed on attacking the individual posters purely in personal terms. Some troll even started a thread that had no other purpose but to attack one of the most calm and considered posters here in entirely personal terms.
Calling something gibberish when it demonstrably is gibberish is not ad hom.
Calling someone a troll when that have been trolling, is not ad hom.
both of them are indescribably awful and will inflict even more damage on the country. Why are you so excited?
both of them are indescribably awful and will inflict even more damage on the country. Why are you so excited?
Tunbridge Wells is a Tory stronghold. I'm sure his audience there loved every word.say and do such very stupid things.
And if his words had gone no further than Tunbridge Wells, all would have been fine. But they will play less well in areas from which he ‘diverted’ funds.Tunbridge Wells is a Tory stronghold. I'm sure his audience there loved every word.
Tunbridge Wells is a Tory stronghold. I'm sure his audience there loved every word.
It’s funny how supposedly very bright people (Cameron, Sunak) say and do such very stupid things. It’s almost as if a public school/Oxbridge education divorced such people from reality.