eisenach
pfm Member
Re-posted images from above:-
![]()
![]()
Regards
Richard
Thank you, Richard.
Re-posted images from above:-
![]()
![]()
Regards
Richard
Don't blame you. It's desperate, pathetic, Tory-man-child cry-baby stuff.I'll take your word for it - I'm not poisoning my brain by reading sh1te like that.
I think you misunderstood what I was saying, which was more about the probability of MLP coming to power. I don't think they'll have a workable majority now, I believe Bardella will chicken out from the PM slot, and this will be held against MLP in 2027. I firmly believe Marine Le Pen, Bardella and all the rest are deep into neo-fascist territory, so we agree on that.And with equal respect, I think you’re demonstrating precisely the complacency that will be disastrous. I’ve frequently argued against the labelling of every authoritarian to the right of Starmer as fascist as, at best, unhelpful. But this is the real deal. It matters not a fig what Bardella utters in public. Fascists have zero respect for democracy.
Le Pen has followed the classic fascist dual strategy of the ballot box and the streets. The street fighting wing has been kept in reserve until now, as Le Pen sought to purge the most overt fascist paraphernalia inherited from her father. She uses the electoral process purely for propaganda purposes. Fascism does not arrive through elections, it is established by physically eliminating all opposition. Many big French industrialists have now thrown their lot in with her. In a straight choice between the far left of Melenchon, and the fascism of Le Pen, big business, even if it baulks at is excesses, will always side with fascism to protect its profits.
Re-posted images from above:-
Well, we both hope you’re right. I don’t think I did misunderstand. I was making the point that fascism will make use of elections only as far as it is useful. Although workable majorities privilege them, whether or not they are attained, is of secondary importance to a movement whose real power is concentrated in a street fighting, paramilitary movement.I think you misunderstood what I was saying, which was more about the probability of MLP coming to power. I don't think they'll have a workable majority now, I believe Bardella will chicken out from the PM slot, and this will be held against MLP in 2027. I firmly believe Marine Le Pen, Bardella and all the rest are deep into neo-fascist territory, so we agree on that.
As for your last sentence, that's not the choice on offer in most places, but in places where it is, Attal's coalition has withdrawn its candidate to support Mélenchon's group. In every case, as far as I can see. Likewise, LFI are supporting Ensemble candidates everywhere. Let's see how their voters behave, fingers crossed.
Yes. The road to fascism is, to use a cliche, a process, not an eventWell, we both hope you’re right. I don’t think I did misunderstand. I was making the point that fascism will make use of elections only as far as it is useful. Although workable majorities privilege them, whether or not they are attained, is of secondary importance to a movement whose real power is concentrated in a street fighting, paramilitary movement.
And while of course it would be ridiculously alarmist to posit that Le Pen has a street army of Brownshirts ready to go on the offensive next Monday, the fascist presence on French streets is growing worryingly, and we are diverted into Parliamentarianism at our peril.
I have seen at least 2 Tory hopefuls (and of course Frog Face) posting on Facebook claiming a small part in the English football victory last nightDesperate straw clutching.
Here we go. Ad hom again. It feels like I am being told I cannot comment on repetition but you can? You haven’t addressed all my points either.You are just trolling again. You have taken a question is asked of someone else but rather than addressing that post you have used it to launch another of your ad hom attacks.
Is the propaganda letter personalised, e.g. is ‘Martin’ the person named on the electoral register at that address. All steering rather close to identity theft if so!
This is how I feel. Let's get the Conservatives out then take stock. The red wall has to be restored and given what and who they voted for last time, they have to be treated with kid gloves imo.You surely cannot dispute that despite the claimed similarities in ideology there won’t be differences in execution? That is my argument. There’s a lot we aren’t being told. It may lean either way. Let’s see.
Quite. But even tactical voting to those ends has been more than frowned upon on this thread. It’s been grim reading at times. However, we can only look forward now.This is how I feel. Let's get the Conservatives out then take stock. The red wall has to be restored and given what and who they voted for last time, they have to be treated with kid gloves imo.
I do feel beaten down by this thread and that it seems one can't celebrate the impending removal of the Tories without being told it's all pointless as Labour are identical. As you said, @Jubal let's see.
I have (by postal vote) voted Labour in my Tory seat in Sussex. Had the boundaries not been changed I would certainly have voted Liberal as I was lucky to live in a Lib/Con marginal previously and would have delighted in helping end Caufield's political career. Sadly I am now stuck in a fairly secure Con seat with a fairly even split of Lib/Lab. Alas, FPTP puts the ghastly Mims in in all probability. So this occasion I've gone Labour as I want to give them a chance as the incoming Government (I shall monitor this result carefully and modulate my vote next time as necessary).
The one thing I am certain of is that anyone protesting with their vote against an admittedly pink-tinged-with-blue Labour in a seat where they might win, and putting the Tory back, should be ashamed come Friday.
I am basically on the same page. This thread gets monopolised by the same old voices who 'know best' & like to display their great knowledge ad nauseum; IMV this kind of preaching does the left no favours. Anyway, my vote has been posted & I am supporting the incumbent Labour MP who I think is pretty decent.This is how I feel. Let's get the Conservatives out then take stock. The red wall has to be restored and given what and who they voted for last time, they have to be treated with kid gloves imo.
I do feel beaten down by this thread and that it seems one can't celebrate the impending removal of the Tories without being told it's all pointless as Labour are identical. As you said, @Jubal let's see.
I have (by postal vote) voted Labour in my Tory seat in Sussex. Had the boundaries not been changed I would certainly have voted Liberal as I was lucky to live in a Lib/Con marginal previously and would have delighted in helping end Caufield's political career. Sadly I am now stuck in a fairly secure Con seat with a fairly even split of Lib/Lab. Alas, FPTP puts the ghastly Mims in in all probability. So this occasion I've gone Labour as I want to give them a chance as the incoming Government (I shall monitor this result carefully and modulate my vote next time as necessary).
The one thing I am certain of is that anyone protesting with their vote against an admittedly pink-tinged-with-blue Labour in a seat where they might win, and putting the Tory back, should be ashamed come Friday.
How many books do you think people have time to order and read before Thursday?! ;-)
Re-posted images from above:-
![]()
![]()
Regards
Richard
Meanwhile Ed Davey is living his best life bungee-jumping the LDs to victory. Undeniably impressive, but I suspect some seats will need a 1970s orange Space Hopper to win from the Tories.