1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Where we are now: The site is back up and running! The character set encoding issue has been fixed so old posts should now look ok. I am currently working on themes/skins etc and I will be deleting the temporary green skin very soon as it has many issues. I will do a very quick variation on the stock blue skin first just to get a light-grey background and san-serif font, and I will set this as default. Later this week I will hopefully add a professional third-party skin in pfm colours (life is way too short to do this crap myself, and I've found one I really like than needs next to no tweaking). We are getting there slowly...
    Dismiss Notice
  3. May I please request people check and update their email address if it is out if date. I ask as I’m getting countless bounce errors as the server fails to send notifications through etc. I’ll eventually figure out how to send these to a black hole somewhere, but it makes sense to address it at source as quite a few folk are obviously not getting the thread and conversations notifications they have set in their preferences.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

panzerholz plinth?

Discussion in 'd.i.y.' started by jamie123, Dec 19, 2016.

  1. misterdog

    misterdog Not the canine kind

  2. Dowser

    Dowser Learning to bodge again..

    Wow - at that price you can't go wrong - sell your stock sub and arm board to reduce the investment by another 40-50% if I didn't have the Sole already I'd grab them - bet the price at least triples in next 3 months :)
     
  3. YNWOAN

    YNWOAN 100% Analogue

    I would feel happier if they stated how much the Corian items weigh- preferably in direct comparison to the Linn items as you really don't want to compress the suspension any more than it is with the standard items.
     
  4. slammed56

    slammed56 pfm Member

    There's a guy redone his Nottingham Analogue Dais turntable in panzerholz and apparently has very good results from the change
     
  5. Chops54

    Chops54 pfm Member

    I found the bounce better with more weight in the subchassis but it's easy to overdo it and have the suspension bottoming out.
     
  6. YNWOAN

    YNWOAN 100% Analogue

    The resonant frequency will be lower but not by much. If using quite a heavy arm like the Ekos SE the spring nearest is already very compressed and I wouldn't personally choose to add any more weight to said chassis or armboard.

    I've received the Hi-macs samples and they look very promising, I think the 'black granite' is likely to be my choice.
     
  7. Helen Bach

    Helen Bach if it ain't Baroque ...

    Corian does not seem to be a good material for hifi constructions, its too stiff and doesn't damp. Apart from that, it looks cheap. Its acrylic filled with alumina, but doesn't seem to do anything good for hifi.
     
  8. JemHayward

    JemHayward pfm Member

    Corian (and similar materials) has a long history in hifi. The cabinets of Wilson speakers are made from a similar material, and its been used as baffles for speakers at the top end of the market for many years. It has an unusually high level of self damping for its stiffness, but is quite expensive when compared with MDF.
     
  9. TimF

    TimF pfm Member

    Trenner & Friedl Art monitor uses Corian/MDF sandwich construction for its front baffle. Seems to work fine and looks pretty good to me. Many ways to skin the cat.
     
  10. Helen Bach

    Helen Bach if it ain't Baroque ...

    I don't know where you get your data from, but Corian has very poor intrinsic damping, about half that of acrylic alone, and about a tenth that required. It may be useful as a component of a composite, as it has about 2 - 3 times the damping ability of mdf, another material which is widely used in loudspeaker construction, but with the damping ability just less than useless.

    There is a weak correlation between stiffness (or Young's modulus) and intrinsic damping, but generally stiff things are not good at damping, examples include metals and ceramics (stone!).

    I can see that Corian was the 'flavour of the year' in 2016, but really, that is all it was. I look forward (with amusement) to see what 2017 brings. Maybe something that really is suitable! ;)
     
  11. YNWOAN

    YNWOAN 100% Analogue

    How have you defined and calculated what is 'required'?
     
  12. Helen Bach

    Helen Bach if it ain't Baroque ...

    The idea is predicated on the assumption that it is important to reduce the amount of unwanted vibrations to a minimum. In the case of a turntable, this means reduction of the vibrations in the mechanicals of the tt, and any aerial and/or seismic intrusion. Any plinth (worthy of the name) must be able to cope with all these vibrations, reducing them to a level where they are not a problem.

    As energy is said to be unable to be created or destroyed, the only only course of action is to turn vibrational energy into heat energy, by dissipation, or as we have come to call it, damping. Damping in this context can be defined as the exponential decay of vibrational energy, and although there are several ways of damping, frictional damping seems to be used the most.

    So we use frictional damping to reduce the energy of the vibrations as quickly as possible, because that gives us the best chance of ensuring a 'clean signal', one that helps us with the fidelity of reproduction.

    It can be shown that higher damping factor (DF) values are of the most benefit, but in reality, a value of 0.4 is a good one to aim for, as above this figure, there are diminishing returns. However, most materials used for audio structures (which need damping) fall far short of this 0.4 DF value, and most are less that 0.1. As an example, the OP mentioned Panzerholz, which has a DF of 0.6 - 0.9. By stark comparison, Corian has a DF of 0.044.
    This means that a structure made of Corian would not be able to cope with vibrations at all well, and would allow these vibrations to continue to be a problem for some time (slate takes over a second to dissipate a single pulse, with a DF of 0.017, same as mdf !) whereas Panzerholz would dissipate the energy very quickly, not allowing those amplitudes to build, which is what happens with low DF materials.

    HTH
     
  13. YNWOAN

    YNWOAN 100% Analogue

    Do you believe that all vibration can be dealt (including seismic intrusion) with just by the material used to make the plinth from?

    The damping factor of a construct can be significantly altered by the methods used to build the structure (plinth) as a whole.
     
  14. Julf

    Julf Evil brother of Mark V Shaney

    I thought the discussion was about materials, not construction?
     
  15. Helen Bach

    Helen Bach if it ain't Baroque ...

    it is usual to talk about the damping factor of a material rather than a structure. Usually, a structure will contain many materials, each with their own DF, but with the possibility of modification by combining materials. If these materials are closely coupled (glued, welded) they form new materials, usually following (to the first approximation) the rule of mixtures. However, even structures which are bolted together can have extra damping conferred at the joints, and I have one turntable/plinth which does just that.

    I don't believe we can ever deal with all the vibrations, but we don't need to, we only have to reduce the amplitudes of the vibrations to a level where they cause no problems. Most plinths/turntables don't.

    I am thinking of a BBC white paper on loudspeaker design. On testing a design, they found that they could hear distortion. Further investigation showed where the distortion was, and what levels they had to be reduced to so as not to be a problem. Listening tests confirmed their measurements. This is a good exemplar where listening and measurements compliment each other.
     
  16. YNWOAN

    YNWOAN 100% Analogue

    With respect, I know all of that. In both your responses you state a whole load of related theory I already know but don't actually answer the question. Let me put it directly; what material* do you think will offer sufficient damping to be useful for seismic intrusion (this is something you claimed earlier).

    * By material I don't mean laminate or constrained layer structure. I have used a constrained layer (many confuse this with laminating) construct of aluminium and viscoelastic bonding and this has produced a structure that is both stiff and very well damped.

    For what it's worth, high self damping is not my primary choice for the material chosen to construct my plinth. IMO, as with many areas of design, to claim one material is inherently better than another is to oversimplify the issues.
     
  17. John R

    John R pfm Member

    I wonder if that is why the Rubikon was so successful?
     
  18. flatpopely

    flatpopely Prog Rock/Moderator

    Thanks for the compliment John, yes it was successful for a number of reasons.

    Mark spent literally hundreds of man hours designing a truly different sub chassis not copying from anyone's ideas. The resulting sound quality was, and is, in our opinion, the equal of the Keel. The design was of such a high standard that once complete we did not need to constantly evolve and therefore leave customers with a MKI wishing they had a MKII, III, IV etc.

    I worked very hard at ensuring the manufacturing/finish and packing was the equal of Linn and I believe we achieved that. This was necessary as we decided early on to sell through Linn dealers; and they, and their customers, demand excellence in this area.

    We were the very first of a new breed of sub chassis for the LP12 that was aimed to be sold via Linn's dealer network - we are very proud that we gained acceptance into this network. Whatever ones views about selling via the dealer channel AudioFlat gained acceptance into it. For Peter at Cymbiosis to dedicate so much time was a mark of how much work we had put into the product!

    Our professional approach to the RubiKon gained us support from Linn and Naim; I'm not prepared to say what that was but suffice to say it's nice to be recognized for being professional at what one does, especially from two of the biggest names in Hi-Fi. I have a nice relationship with people at Linn and post on their Forum from time to time.

    The product got a favorable mention from Paul Messenger and he used a RubiKon in his own LP12 for a while.

    We stopped manufacture of it for two reasons:-
    1. Our supplier was unable to get the constancy we required.
    2. Mark and I have full time jobs and the man hours required to deal with ongoing manufacturing issues meant we had to call time.

    Actually the timing proved to be good as Linn had just released the 'Kore'. At the time £700 represented amazing vfm and with the support and backup from Linn via its dealers it remains an extremely compelling option at the sub £1k chassis point.

    The good news is that Mark and I are still friends in spite of all the 'business' difficulties we went through, and believe me it wasn't easy!
    There are still 20+ people out there enjoying the RubiKon, they are very lucky as it's a superb chassis for the LP12, designed from first principals to sound better than anything else using sound engineering, not finger in the wind stuff.
    We still have all the CAD files so who knows one day we may make them again!
     
  19. John R

    John R pfm Member

    I'm glad for you.

    Interestingly our Sole chassis was commented upon by Paul M when I met him and discussed the philosophy behind it a few years ago he also kcomented on it in an article published in HFC. Paul invited me over to his place in Herne Bay so he could review it, but to be honest things were and are going so well and with pressures in my previous days job, I just did not get around to it.

    It's interesting to read your comment the various incarnations of Sole, which was as you know commented on a while ago by your design colleague. I am one who believes strongly in continuous improvement and am not so bold as to believe that I can never improve on an earlier design of my own or anyone else's for that matter. I believe that comes from having to do so in a quite stressful corporate manufacturing role, one in which I am now thankfully retired giving me more time to concentrate on things closer to home. :)


    Regards to you.

    John R.

    BTW be good to see the Rubikon re enter the fray one day as I've always been one for offering more choice.
     
  20. YNWOAN

    YNWOAN 100% Analogue

    Well yes, but the two are inherently intertwined unless one only intends to use a single piece of said material. Also, my point (though not very clearly made) was really to say that considering the DF of a material in isolation is of little direct value.
     

Share This Page