advertisement


War declared, Israel v Palestine...

14

The Israeli / Iranian war is between two governments undeserving of support. Unless we support a higher good, why are we intervening?

Posted on April 15 2024

Since I have commented quite extensively on the Israeli action in Gaza I think I should do so on the Iranian / Israeli conflict.
There are a number of things to point out. The first is that theocracy is not a sound basis for government anywhere. Nor does it produce stability.
I do, of course, have major concerns about the direction of politics in Iran. As it moves increasingly to the right the risk of conflict is growing.
The same is true, though, in Israel where increasingly powerful right-wing theocratic groups have also helped destabilise the country and good government, resulting in the current regime that is as worrying as that in Tehran.
I make the point for the obvious reason that there are no governments worthy of support in this conflict.
Intervention has then to be to preserve a greater good, which is the existential right of states to be. I presume that this is the justification for UK and US intervention on behalf of Israel, although I do not hear that being said. If it is, there is a logic to it. Israel has a right to be.
However, the right to preserve this greater good is not restricted to Israel. Palestine also has a right to be. Israel appears to be denying that by its actions in both Gaza and the West Bank.
In that case I think support for Israel has to be conditional to match the condemnation of the actions of Iran. If it is to be supported Israel's government must respect boundaries determined in law and international agreements. The US and UK have the necessary obligation to make that clear.
This conflict has been created by the actions of two governments that have few redeeming characteristics. I support neither, but respect the rights of the nations and peoples they represent. The role of the international community is to find a higher good. David Cameron ‘s ‘Top gun' language this morning does not suggest we are in anything like that position as yet. That's as depressing as is the persistence of these theocratic governments that are promoting fear and terror.
 
As I said, it was past his bedtime.
To be fair, we're not of a mindset that increases divisions, stokes conflicts and escalates wars. The ultimate conclusion if left unchecked by those of us who want this madness to stop, is WWIII. If that happens, you, me, all our loved ones, and billions of others on the planet will die in a flash of nuclear fire, or radiation sickness.

But you carry on....
 
Last edited:
[Got to have the last word...]

An Israeli source has been briefing the media that Israel cannot allow such a large attack – involving more than 300 drones and missiles, launched directly from Iran for the first time – to pass without some kind of response.

Some Israeli politicians argue that a powerful message needs to be sent so that Iran doesn’t repeat its action.

 
14

The Israeli / Iranian war is between two governments undeserving of support. Unless we support a higher good, why are we intervening?

Posted on April 15 2024

Since I have commented quite extensively on the Israeli action in Gaza I think I should do so on the Iranian / Israeli conflict.
There are a number of things to point out. The first is that theocracy is not a sound basis for government anywhere. Nor does it produce stability.
I do, of course, have major concerns about the direction of politics in Iran. As it moves increasingly to the right the risk of conflict is growing.
The same is true, though, in Israel where increasingly powerful right-wing theocratic groups have also helped destabilise the country and good government, resulting in the current regime that is as worrying as that in Tehran.
I make the point for the obvious reason that there are no governments worthy of support in this conflict.
Intervention has then to be to preserve a greater good, which is the existential right of states to be. I presume that this is the justification for UK and US intervention on behalf of Israel, although I do not hear that being said. If it is, there is a logic to it. Israel has a right to be.
However, the right to preserve this greater good is not restricted to Israel. Palestine also has a right to be. Israel appears to be denying that by its actions in both Gaza and the West Bank.
In that case I think support for Israel has to be conditional to match the condemnation of the actions of Iran. If it is to be supported Israel's government must respect boundaries determined in law and international agreements. The US and UK have the necessary obligation to make that clear.
This conflict has been created by the actions of two governments that have few redeeming characteristics. I support neither, but respect the rights of the nations and peoples they represent. The role of the international community is to find a higher good. David Cameron ‘s ‘Top gun' language this morning does not suggest we are in anything like that position as yet. That's as depressing as is the persistence of these theocratic governments that are promoting fear and terror.

Nice to cite the source if you're going to paste words that are not your own.
 
I thought the big fat title linking to the source made it rather obvious
On my browser at least hovering on the link doesn't reveal the source and I'm not in the habit of clicking on unknown links. What's the problem with acknowledging the source in your post?
 
<moderating>

I’ve cleaned up some ad hominem. I find the defending of genocide, child murder, imposed starvation, and violent apartheid from some quarters repugnant and would request those posters to take that content to far-right sites where that vile mindset belongs, but I don’t want to host bickering either so would request everyone raise their game.
 
According to Stats for Lefties, 60% of people hold an unfavourable view of Israel's actions. Good to see that reflected in the Parliamentary debate today.
Oh, hang on, I don't think that there was any dissenting view. These politicians are living in a vacuum.
 
Sounds as if Israel will be bombing Iran very soon.

"...a retaliatory move could come “as soon as Monday.” In an unsourced report, Channel 12 claimed the war cabinet has decided to hit back “clearly and forcefully” against Iran with a response designed to send the message that Israel “will not allow an attack of that magnitude against it to pass without a reaction.”"

 
Sounds as if Israel will be bombing Iran very soon.

"...a retaliatory move could come “as soon as Monday.” In an unsourced report, Channel 12 claimed the war cabinet has decided to hit back “clearly and forcefully” against Iran with a response designed to send the message that Israel “will not allow an attack of that magnitude against it to pass without a reaction.”"

I guess Israel has found an excuse for attacking Irans nuclear facilities, America will support them somehow. :eek:
 

Far too long to post in entirely here, but this is a superb account from Israeli academic Lee Mordechai. Really worth a read, especially the tiny minority here who still, even now, don’t see Netanyahu’s far-right racist rage and mass slaughter of innocents as what it so clearly is.

Full paper is here, though you need to register to see it:


Full Twitter thread formatted on ThreadReader here:

 

UN rapporteur says Israel and war sponsors ‘legally, morally responsible’ for Gaza’s reconstruction

Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territory, said Israel and those providing military and political support for its war on Gaza are legally and morally responsible for rebuilding the Palestinian enclave.
In a post on social media outlining the projected $18.5bn damage inflicted on the territory by Israel’s war so far, Albanese said she considered the systematic destruction of housing and civilian infrastructure a “war crime, crime against humanity, and part of the genocide” in Gaza.
Israel, who is mainly “responsible for this destruction, as well as the countries that have supplied military, material and political support for the last Gaza war, bear the ‘legal and moral responsibility’ to ensure reparations”, Albanese said.
The UN special rapporteur was among other UN experts who earlier released a statement deploring Israel’s reported use of artificial intelligence and “related military directives” in Gaza, which have led “to an unprecedented toll on the civilian population, housing, vital services and infrastructure”.
Together with other UN experts, I have condemned
the systematic and widespread destruction of housing, services and civilian infrastructure in Gaza as a war crime, crime against humanity and part of the genocide described in my #AnatomyofGenocide report.
The @WorldBank , #UN
— Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt (@FranceskAlbs) April 15, 2024
 
It baffles me why Israel thinks that any action they may take on Iran's soil will not result in retaliation. I'm not talking about the actions but more asking why their judgement is so poor. Why do they think military action will restore deterrence?
 


advertisement


Back
Top