Would the same justification apply to an attack on an Israeli embassy?They bombed one Iranian Consulate in Syria.
Israel take the fight to those who promote terrorist activities against Israel - this is not new and I am surprised anyone is surprised. Israel do not want a world war, they are not unhinged, it is a message to those who think they can attack using second or third parties.
I don't condone it, but I do understand the tactic.
It was an explanation not a justification; in an armed conflict Syria or Iran would be "justified" to retaliate in kind. I doubt that have the nerve to do so directly.Would the same justification apply to an attack on an Israeli embassy?
….because they would receive international condemnation, especially from UK and US.It was an explanation not a justification; in an armed conflict Syria or Iran would be "justified" to retaliate in kind. I doubt that have the nerve to do so directly.
It makes sense. Iran is supplying weapons to Hezbolla and Hamas to use against Israel, and has openly and repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel. So if there is a guy in Damascus, the capital of a country that is technically "at war" with Israel, who is managing the supply of arms to Hezbolla, I'd say he is a perfectly legitimate target. Indicative of who is supporting whom, that Russia and China have both criticized the Israeli attack.They bombed one Iranian Consulate in Syria.
Israel take the fight to those who promote terrorist activities against Israel - this is not new and I am surprised anyone is surprised. Israel do not want a world war, they are not unhinged, it is a message to those who think they can attack using second or third parties.
I don't condone it, but I do understand the tactic.
How's that look?It makes sense. The Uk is supplying weapons to israel and the idf to use against Palastine and has openly and repeatedly called for the destruction of Hamas. So if there is a guy in London, the capital of a country that is technically "at war" with Palestine , who is managing the supply of arms to the idf, I'd say he is a perfectly legitimate target.
You could also turn it around and say that its Arab neighbours have been baiting Israel since 1948. Refusal to accept its existence, repeated wars of attack seeking its destruction, the holding of Palestinian refugees in squalid camps for decades. More recently the Oct 7 massacre, thousands of rockets fired from Gaza and a good few from Hezbollah, and Hamas' refusal to release the Israeli hostages as a condition of a ceasefire.Israel is baiting the Arab world in very dangerous ways, and the USA and indeed the rest of the world should be very worried about reprisals. The monstrous crimes of Israel in Gaza are pushing the Arab world to the brink. Unfortunately the USA will feel obliged to take sides with Israel in any conflict and escalation could happen quite suddenly in the worst case. Very worrying, because this involves Russia too, and relations there are already on a knife edge.
No. Israel was attacking Palestinians before 1948.You could also turn it around and say that its Arab neighbours have been baiting Israel since 1948. Refusal to accept its existence, repeated wars of attack seeking its destruction, the holding of Palestinian refugees in squalid camps for decades. More recently the Oct 7 massacre, thousands of rockets fired from Gaza and a good few from Hezbollah, and Hamas' refusal to release the Israeli hostages as a condition of a ceasefire.
I agree that Russia is deeply involved, as of course is Iran.
No. Israel was attacking Palestinians before 1948.
The occupation of Palestine was sanctioned by the UN, but is a colonial settler occupation nonetheless, and Israel has broken any number of UN resolutions regarding it’s occupation and expansion ever since.
Yes, and Palestinian Arabs were attacking Palestinian Jews before 1948.No. Israel was attacking Palestinians before 1948.
The occupation of Palestine was sanctioned by the UN, but is a colonial settler occupation nonetheless, and Israel has broken any number of UN resolutions regarding it’s occupation and expansion ever since.
Yes. Hamas is declared a terrorist organisation.Israel always insists that it should be treated like any other country.
It's defenders call anyone who deviates from impartiality an anti-Semite.
OK, then.
If any other country in the Middle East had done what Israel has done in the last six months, Western military forces would have intervened a long time ago.
When do we start bombing Tel Aviv?
When do we give Netanyahu the Saddam Hussein treatment?