sean99
pfm Member
I would not want to inflict English "champagne" on my worst enemy.
We had Nyetimber at my sister's wedding a few years ago and it seemed perfectly good to me.
I would not want to inflict English "champagne" on my worst enemy.
I would not want to inflict English "champagne" on my worst enemy.
Get with the programme, there are some excellent English wine makers now. Chapel Down and Camel Valley are two worth a look.
Will the government bring forward the EU referendum? There's talk of it happening in 2016 as opposed to 2017 - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/11/david-cameron-european-union-referendum
My initial thoughts is this would be better. A long delay before such a referendum could stifle big companies from making investment decisions and possibly slow the economy. If Cameron is going to try and negotiate anything, better to go into such things with a credible threat following sooner rather than later.
The problem with that is that they may have inadequate time to get their relocation strategies in place.
"Camel Valley... for when a toe is not enough..."
...the point about Champagne is not the excellence and taste, this is not the point of Champers but the vulgarity of the bottle and price paid. English people and PFM always get this bit wrong... Good as your idea of a trumped up posh Babysham might taste, no one drinks fizzy wine wine for fun except to get someone tipsy enough to slip them a drug to give them their swiss bank details and location of the secret lair... For starters, "English Champagne" is too cheap, there is no sense of "I have pissed away Northumberland's healthcare budget on a Grand Cru Karl Largerfield edition and a beluga caviar simply in order to hurt the poor and perhaps stamp on their faces a bit".
You guys will be defending Aldi next.
Get with the programme, there are some excellent English wine makers now. Chapel Down and Camel Valley are two worth a look.
its yer actual global warming an stuff, innit
Will the government bring forward the EU referendum? There's talk of it happening in 2016 as opposed to 2017 - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/11/david-cameron-european-union-referendum
My initial thoughts is this would be better. A long delay before such a referendum could stifle big companies from making investment decisions and possibly slow the economy. If Cameron is going to try and negotiate anything, better to go into such things with a credible threat following sooner rather than later.
Champagne is revolting - if you must destroy your liver and brain, at least do it with something that tastes good.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...hinging-why-the-Left-are-such-bad-losers.html
Can the Politburo pause their hand wringing and teeth gnashing for a few moments and read this nice article above?