Same. And my DD does so just as effectively as the idlers I have/have owned and better than my LP12 ever did.We are all different though, I can just as easily be drawn in with digital.
Too bad ditching the springs on the LP12 wasn‘t an option for you.Same. And my DD does so just as effectively as the idlers I have/have owned and better than my LP12 ever did.
I prefer having decks which were designed properly from the off.Too bad ditching the springs on the LP12 wasn‘t an option for you.
Hardtail LP12 here as well. Wouldn’t go back to springs for love or money.I prefer having decks which were designed properly from the off.
OK kidding. But I do find this phenomenon with the springs fascinating. I really should hear an LP12 of similar spec to my own sans springs and compare to my Garrard, Lenco and Technics.
Yes, the LP12 is a terrible design. Which probably explains why it was commercial disaster.I prefer having decks which were designed properly from the off.
I don't have an obsession with belt drive. I have an obsession with owning hi-fi I like the sound of.I just don’t get this obsession with belt drive?!?
…..not aimed at you specifically, but at all acolytes of belt…..it technically makes no sense and being an audiophile is about detail and accurate reproduction. When it comes to belt drive, however, audiophiles get misty-eyed.I don't have an obsession with belt drive. I have an obsession with owning hi-fi I like the sound of.