advertisement


My new car (Warning: Porsche content)

The macan is what I swapped my CaymanS for.
The Macan is indeed a superb real-world car, better in a lot of respects than the cayman. But I will always love the Cayman more than I respect the Macan. Heart vs head, etc.
SteveG, for a high days & holidays SLK replacement at £30k, I’d be looking at a CaymanS, 2011 onwards, or even a 981 Boxster.
I love the 911 & yes, ultimately it’s quicker & more prestigious. But at that price point, for a ‘fun’ car, I’d stick with the cheaper/younger siblings. Both the Boxster and the Cayman are significantly better than an SLK, but easy to drive & actually surprisingly cheap to run.
 
Both the Boxster and the Cayman are significantly better than an SLK, but easy to drive & actually surprisingly cheap to run.

I had an SLK 350 (2009) before the Cayman. I can confirm that the Porsches are much much nicer things.

Just renewed my fully comp insurance and paid £205 for the year. Mind you, tax was £300’ish.
 
I had an SLK 350 (2009) before the Cayman. I can confirm that the Porsches are much much nicer things.

Just renewed my fully comp insurance and paid £205 for the year. Mind you, tax was £300’ish.
I agree before my two Boxster S's I had an SLK 350 for 3 years followed by an SLK 55 AMG which in my book is the only SLK worth having.
 
Does anyone ever actually attempt to put humans in the rear seat of a 911?

Wouldn't that be a human rights violation in most civilized countries?

Did it a handful of times with mine. And, my brother in law often thinks he should have bought a 911 instead of the Cayman, as then he'd have had two useful cars instead of just one.

And, those rear seats are an extremely useful space for clothes, baggage, four empty Fraim boxes on loan from a friendly dealer... The 911 was perfect for us, both over 6ft tall, needing elbow room, and not want three cars instead of two.

As mentioned above, you HAVE to try all the options, if only to be fair to yourself.
 
Does anyone ever actually attempt to put humans in the rear seat of a 911?

Wouldn't that be a human rights violation in most civilized countries?

I was once transported home from the pub in the back seat of a Triumph Spitfire. Have I a claim for compensation?
 
Oh I'd allow those :D Actually the A series has a unique twang thanks to the siamesed ports - fabulous when on song to my ears, in most states of tune. The sound of a 'fast' Mini, accept no substitutes there.

So this is a fast mini. Incredible sound, well worth listening from the beginning to get the full build up to the final throttle moment.

 
Damn, too cold and wet for the bike today...

28107223429_842dfa4db1_c.jpg
 
I was once transported home from the pub in the back seat of a Triumph Spitfire. Have I a claim for compensation?
I spent a happy day touring the Yorkshire Dales aged 17 in the back of a mate's Spit. Happily I'm not a very big guy and certainly wasn't aged 17.
 
Did it a handful of times with mine. And, my brother in law often thinks he should have bought a 911 instead of the Cayman, as then he'd have had two useful cars instead of just one.

And, those rear seats are an extremely useful space for clothes, baggage, four empty Fraim boxes on loan from a friendly dealer... The 911 was perfect for us, both over 6ft tall, needing elbow room, and not want three cars instead of two.
.

I think the small seats make a lot of sense and make the car a lot more useable. On a few occasions last year I went out for the day with 2 pals, my toy car is a strict 2 seater. If we’d had a 2+2 it would have been used, instead I had to leave it behind and take the tintop. When you aren’t using the things they make less sense.
 
There's been loads of cars in the past that I've lusted after, decided I can afford, but then chickened out at the last minute with doubts.
Congratulations Whaleblue on actually going through with it !
 
There are quite a few Macan's where I live and they do look nice, however I've already got a fairly quick SUV (one of the petrol Mazda CX-7's) so am more thinking about a sports car. Either the 911 or Cayman will be a lot sportier than SWMBO's current SLK as it's the diesel one (which is actually reasonably quick however doesn't sound like a sports car should, and doesn't rev like a sports car should).
 
Love the look of your Cayman, WB.

Whilst I've never driven a Cayman, I've driven & enjoyed several Boxsters over the years. I owned an early 911 C4 cab around the turn of the century for several years, as a result of which I would always go for a 911 over a Boxster or Cayman : that extra space is SO useful (even for humans, though one has to stuff them in...).
 
Thing is, you never can tell how long you're going to live, so it makes sense to get your mid-life crisis/crises in early. I had my first at 19 and one roughly every 3-4 years since - just to be on the safe side.

Do you mean wives or cars Alan?
 
it is interesting I twice went into a Porsche dealership with the intention of looking at used 911's and both times I came out with a new Boxster S. In fact on the first occasion my wife thought I was off out in the SLK 55 AMG to buy a loaf of bread, but I came back two hours later having signed on the dotted line for a new Boxster S.
 
Being a Brit Sports car owner (but tempted more and more by a Porsche) I think the slk 55 is a far more rare beast with a sound track to match and great to take to shows than most Boxsters.

I did in fact try 2 different Boxsters at my pals specialist car dealership last year. A 2.7 PDK (or will it have been a 2.9) and the 3.4s. Without doubt superbly built compared to what I buy and certainly more wife friendly..........but forgive me for saying just too ordinary and not an event to be in. For an everyday ride I'd say they can't be beaten if you want a sports car daily. and I know the day is nearing when I finally get sensible and buy one.
 
My wife is keen on convertibles so I'm expecting there could be some pressure to consider a Boxster instead of a Cayman.
 


advertisement


Back
Top