advertisement


Cars: Audi, BMW, Mercedes

Had 6 Vauxhalls in past few years , 99% reliable . Before that had a Vw golf from new , in garage 14 times in first year with multiple problems !
 
In 47 years and over 1m miles the only car that failed on me (broke down) was a Renault. Lots of Rover, BMW, Audi, Ford, VW, Toyota cars over that time…just the one French car. Again though I’m a sample of one.
 
Had 6 Vauxhalls in past few years , 99% reliable . Before that had a Vw golf from new , in garage 14 times in first year with multiple problems !

Last three vehicles have been VWs - 2007 GTI, 2010 GTI, 2019 Golf R, all from new. The middle one had one major problem, a manufacturing defect which required replacement of the engine and turbo in the first year, which was handled painlessly, and afterwards the car was perfect for the remaining eight years I owned it.
 
I just returned from a great holiday in France. Unfortunately this has been the the third year in a row that my Volvo (V60 D6) broke down while in another country. So it has to go. But after driving Volvo for over 10 years I wonder where I should go. How reliable are (petrol) cars from the well known German brands; any good or bad experiences? Looking at A4, 3 and C from around 2017.

Mazdas are doing some fine things with Petrol tech ATM.

Look at one of their 'fully optioned' models with a few years depreciation on it.

They make nice manual boxes too if you're that type of driver.
 
Indeed, sample size of one is not of much use. My 6 year old Octavia has had nothing go wrong at all.

JD power is probably the best gauge of general reliability with a good sample size...you might not be thinking about BMW anymore if you have not seen this - scroll down for the manufacturer's overall graph:

https://europe.jdpower.com/press-releases/2019-uk-vehicle-dependability-study

https://europe.jdpower.com/press-releases/2018-uk-vehicle-dependability-study

https://europe.jdpower.com/press-releases/2017-uk-vehicle-dependability-study

https://www.buyacar.co.uk/cars/used-cars/157/most-reliable-cars

Do the JD Power surveys still only cover cars for the first three years of their life? If so, not relevant to the OP.

Is reliability really that important to you? If so, and if it’s above everything else, fair enough, buy a Honda and hope your choice pays off. If other factors are at or near the top of your list, then make a different choice.

If you look at the figures in surveys, there’s not a lot of real world difference between most makes now. Thirty years ago it was a very different story!
 
Just an NCC-1701 here. Very reliable.

Ah, who am I kidding? Something goes wrong in almost every episode, but it has classic looks, a cool interior and the captain's chair is to die for.

Joe
 
Smashing cars, comfortable, reliable, powerful enough form most and some of the best aftersales support you can find. The CVT can be a deal-breaker, tho'. An IS300h is worth a test drive.
Yes it’s a shame that Lexus use CVT boxes. I wouldn’t even consider another brand if they offered a regular auto option. Still, as you say an IS300h is worth a look as some don’t seem to mind CVT.
 
I’d go for a Korean EV if it was me. German fossil cars are starting to become rather old fashioned with all of the new EV kids on the block.

Disclaimer: i own a newish C class diesel which is nice enough but i am thinking of getting rid of it because EVs are far better to drive in my opinion. My wife’s Jaguar I-Pace is just lovely.

The I-Pace does look a lovely thing but it's pricey (triple the stated budget) and I'm not convinced I'd be including Jaguars in a discussion on cars where reliability is a big factor. They're the 2nd most broken down brand I see on my travels (although a long way short of the first, which is Land Rover/Range rover).
 
Do the JD Power surveys still only cover cars for the first three years of their life? If so, not relevant to the OP.

I've never been that convinced by those types of surveys as there seems to be an element of "I expected my car to be crap, but it's not quite as crap as I expected" from some buyers, while others (often of the premium brands or ones known for reliability) there is an element of "I expected my VW to be perfect but I've given it a score of 1 out of 10 because I had to replace a tyre after 20,000 miles".
 
There is variation between models within a brand. Some factories in some countries are better than others within the same brand.
 
Yes, whether a car's reliable or not's pot luck in many ways. But then it does seem some people suffer much more than others when it comes to car troubles. Having a good local dealer/specialist is a big plus.

We're all relating personal experiences and preferences of course. We've had the best reliability with BMWs - of the six we've owned, the only fault was with SWMBO's 3 Series' indicators which would occasionally play up - fixed under warranty. My original 5 Series 525tds Touring did 130K+ miles in four years, totally reliably. I've now ditched Macan & 911 Porches, fun though they were, and gone back to a 5 Series Touring. It's a 540i, remarkably speedy, lovely handling, loads of gadgets, and its fuel consumption is far better than I was led to believe - 40mpg on our long steady run to the Lake District.

I reckon this one will see me out.
 
I'm also thinking about cars again as my wife's SLK is possibly up for replacement as (being the diesel) it doesn't meet the requirements to be allowed into Edinburgh's upcoming green zone. I've had a very good look at the available EV's and they are definitely getting closer, with something like the bigger battery version of the Leaf, the Ioniq or the e-Niro coming close to meeting most of my needs (big enough to carry a Labrador, plus a stated range well above 200 miles as I do bi-weekly trips between Edinburgh and the Cairngorms with a hilly route that's between 130 and 170 miles dependent on route/weather). They are all pretty boring though, as well as still being relatively expensive - with the more interesting cars either having too short a range or being far too expensive to consider. I also tend to buy cars outright but that'd be madness with an EV I think, and it's clear going the EV route would still be a very much more expensive option that sticking with petrol for now. I suspect it'll be a different situation in 5-years time when I'm considering replacing my C-class estate.

Current thinking is that the SLK will probably get replaced by a Mercedes 4x4 for general use plus either a classic convertible or maybe an older Boxster.
 
the only fault was with SWMBO's 3 Series' indicators which would occasionally play up

In a BMW? How would you have even noticed that...?

As an aside I followed a traffic police BMW X5 from one side of Edinburgh to the other at the weekend and not once did the indicators get used, despite there being lots of twists and turns to avoid all the roadworks etc.
 
The I-Pace does look a lovely thing but it's pricey (triple the stated budget) and I'm not convinced I'd be including Jaguars in a discussion on cars where reliability is a big factor. They're the 2nd most broken down brand I see on my travels (although a long way short of the first, which is Land Rover/Range rover).

I wasn't recommending the OP gets an i-Pace, just stating that EVs are far nicer to drive than ICE cars, which is why the OP should perhaps consider one. They are so good that it makes us wonder why me and my wife put up conventional cars for so long.
 
The I-Pace does look a lovely thing but it's pricey (triple the stated budget) and I'm not convinced I'd be including Jaguars in a discussion on cars where reliability is a big factor. They're the 2nd most broken down brand I see on my travels (although a long way short of the first, which is Land Rover/Range rover).
My Jaguar XE is three and a half years old and has been trouble free. The main problems owners on the XE Forum report is with the stop/start failing to stop the engine at rest, but that's easily remedied.
 
Have to agree with the pot luck theory.

Had a range of cars over many years, several VWs, six BMWs a couple of older RRs, a couple of Mercs, a couple of Volvos, a Saab and a long term Lotus. One BMW out of six had a mapping issue that was easily fixed. Two Mercs were reliable but there was a very obvious drop in build quality in the same model from one to a later version.

Mk1 RR was pretty reliable few niggles many of whoch you could access and deal with yourself. The later (Mk2) was a dog and I'd never have another RR. Cracked bore liners in an engine at 24k. Ended up haranging the CEO until I got a significant contribution.

The Audi A4 was faultless, impressive for a convertible. Volvos (T4 and C70 T5) and Saab 900 Turbo (absurdly over-engineered) were both faultless as were VWs (two Golf GTIs a Scirroco GTX and a Corrado G60), except a Phaeton Company Car, which developed expensive engine management issues and chewed through two wheel bearings in addition to consumables by 60k.

Interestingly despite the rep for unreliable cars in the 70s, the Lotus (Loads Of Trouble Usually Serious) Elise S1 had no problems at all in 14 years of ownership.
 
A friend has just taken delivery of a new Kia EV6. He loves it but his wife absolutely hates the thing, so it might not stick around for too long!
 
As an aside I followed a traffic police BMW X5 from one side of Edinburgh to the other at the weekend and not once did the indicators get used, despite there being lots of twists and turns to avoid all the roadworks etc.
You indicate to pass roadworks?
 


advertisement


Back
Top