As ever, a total misrepresentation on your part of what I said. Where did I say any of that?Took you off ignore just to see if you’ve wised up. So there are no recognised benefits to Brexit because “remainers” don’t accept Brexit and not because Brexit was fundamentally a shit idea in the first place. Righto.
C’mon he deserves a peerage. Lord Halitosis of Fascistshire.
Nigel the attention-seeking racist has been spotted by an American now.
C’mon he deserves a peerage. Lord Halitosis of Fascistshire.
That’s the naughtiest post I’ve seen in a long time-along with the one you were replying to. I award both fifteen emojis and ten LMAOs
MEGA? Anyway, you should be lecturing the nationalists, the people who undermined the Labour party, the tory voters and those who refuse to support the opposition to the tories. There was plenty of opportunity for there to be no brexit. Many of those who complain the loudest are part of why it has happened.
Ah, well if that's the way your mind works. When was England great?Make England Great Again. Brexit should really be called Engxit, but it's just not as catchy...
Eejit?Spanish pronunciation?
It’s like full circle again. I said 6 years ago there will never be a benefit of brexit accepted by the uncompromising minority who don’t respect the outcome of a democratic referendum.
Ah, well if that's the way your mind works. When was England great?
No, we respected democracy. We love democracy. We just wanted another referendum when even the numb ****s who voted for it in 2016 could see, because the information was in, that it was a shit idea with zero upsides. Now would be great time. So are you a democrat or are you happy suppressing democracy?It’s like full circle again. I said 6 years ago there will never be a benefit of brexit accepted by the uncompromising minority who don’t respect the outcome of a democratic referendum.
…and then a short sharp drop.He certainly deserves elevation.
Firstly, despite a fair amount of relatively open-minded searching I've yet to hear of any benefit to Brexit to accept, so the first bit is somewhat moot. But secondly, accepting the outcome of a democratic process does not require one to cease all criticism of the outcome. Most democratic processes can be reversed within 4 or 5 years if the populus so decides. Arguments for a second referendum when the facts were better known is merely arguing for more democracy, not undermining it.It’s like full circle again. I said 6 years ago there will never be a benefit of brexit accepted by the uncompromising minority who don’t respect the outcome of a democratic referendum.
I have a lot of time for what you say but it would be so much easier if you would speak plainly instead of playing silly linguistic games.As ever, a total misrepresentation on your part of what I said. Where did I say any of that?
I have no idea. Genuine answer. What difference would it make? 3 years after the referendum there was an opportunity to mitigate it but the tories won a huge majority, helped by everyone who did not support Labour in a seat they previously held or were 2nd. Perhaps you should ask those people why they did not support a change in govt?A genuine question Brian - of those who voted for Brexit back in the day, do you believe the majority would still agree that leaving the EU was the correct decision ?
Can you be clearer about what you are asking? You seem to be suggesting or implying something with these topic shifts. What is it? Spit it out.Asked those who voted Leave. Or Nigel Fürage...
You should have supported Labour and encouraged others to do the same.No, we respected democracy. We love democracy. We just wanted another referendum when even the numb ****s who voted for it in 2016 could see, because the information was in, that it was a shit idea with zero upsides. Now would be great time. So are you a democrat or are you happy suppressing democracy?
I agree.Firstly, despite a fair amount of relatively open-minded searching I've yet to hear of any benefit to Brexit to accept, so the first bit is somewhat moot. But secondly, accepting the outcome of a democratic process does not require one to cease all criticism of the outcome. Most democratic processes can be reversed within 4 or 5 years if the populus so decides. Arguments for a second referendum when the facts were better known is merely arguing for more democracy, not undermining it.
I don’t play linguistic games, that’s for others. Which bit isn’t plain from what I posted yesterday? It looks clear to me and my position always has been clear. I don’t support brexit, I don’t think it was a good idea, there was no need for brexit at all and no need for a tory hard brexit in particular. There is more to it than the people who voted leave. Much more. Is that not clear?I have a lot of time for what you say but it would be so much easier if you would speak plainly instead of playing silly linguistic games.
….and then I think that I really shouldn’t take pfm seriously and that it is much more fun posting gags.
... nor do you keep having more votes until you get the result you want...
You do if 'you' are the EU. Which, of course, is one of the reasons why this democracy voted to leave the EU.