It's about culpability, Eva has admitted that she often lied about her age.
If you wish to check the source,see my earlier posts.
Certain Pink Fish Mendacity forum members seems to think that such behaviour is acceptable, matt j for example may have read some of the articles accusing Ryan Adams of illegal behaviour. These articles, see N.Y.T. and Daily Mail online.
He has chosen to take the alleged age of Eva in these articles of 16/15/14 years of age and alter them to post online to the world that she was 13, then 12, after I requested a source for his 'facts'.
( I see Natara is now quoting matt j's 'fake news' )
He then accuses me of being a straw man...
Maybe we should crowdfund a mirror for him.
straw man
noun
- a person regarded as having no substance or integrity.
No.It's about culpability, Eva has admitted that she often lied about her age.
I think the point was that if she had represented herself as underage mr Adam's 'might' have walked on by
And they never met in person so no 'hands on' to worry about. Not that he doesn't have something to worry about. A lot of the hot air up thread talks like he was sh*gging her on a regular basis. He had no verifiable way of ascertaining her age over the internet is she didn't explicitly want him to know her true age. All the same.. he has some questions to answer.
In which case anyone with half a brain would run a mile.
If you don't want to be suspected of misogyny, don't make your first post in a thread like this an account of women in your life 'behaving inappropriately. 'Churchill = villain.
Misterdog = misogynist.
Sean = sheep.
You can assume anything you want if you're not on the jury. People seem to think this legal principle means no one is allowed to criticize anyone.When is it ok to 'assume' someone is guilty? When it appears on social media, when they are arrested or when they are found guilty in a court?
Not everything is always as it seems when you don't have access to all the facts.
You can assume anything you want if you're not on the jury.
He was never arrested, and it was not until June 2016 that he felt somewhat vindicated when the Crown Prosecution Service announced that it had reviewed claims made against him made by four men and felt there was “insufficient evidence” to warrant him being charged. No further action would be taken, it said.
Assumption seems to feature heavily in your belief system.
Far from assuming Ryan's guilt, for example, I'm firmly in the 'I don't know and I don't care' camp.
I hereby invent the term 'Male Justice Warrior' (MJW) in your honor.
Interesting. Do you generally take a skeptical view of allegations of racism?Though you feel the need to post on a thread in which you have no interest ?
So when I recently supported a female accused of racism what term would you bestow on me ?