advertisement


Epos ES14 (MK1) equal or better out there?

cant be arsed to read entire 14? page thread.

Epos speakers - my knowledge of them is this - practically no crossover, just the tweeter is damped down to the bass.

No wadding in there.


This reminds me most of ''totem'' speakers, so if you want something of a similar recipe that would sound like a place to try.


There's no magic recipe's... there are only recipe's.
 
Hi - it should be noted I haven't opened any Epos or Totem speakers, this is just what I've heard from enough people to form a view that ''this is probably how they are made''.
 
Its the ES14s Graeme:-

DSC_3989.jpg
 
Should replace the foam, which I've found in the past makes bass sound unnatural, think of a drum made of a polypropylene ice cream tub, has a plasticky thud thud sound. I use deflex panels and lambs wool.
 
Better baaaaa ss!

Aye and pigs can fly.

You didn't tell us what other kit you've got, but as you've got a NAP300 I'll hazard a guess you have a £20k system driving £200 speakers. Get your card out and spend a few grand for gawds sake.

Mr Tibbs

Merry Crimbo by the way!
 
Aye and pigs can fly.

You didn't tell us what other kit you've got, but as you've got a NAP300 I'll hazard a guess you have a £20k system driving £200 speakers. Get your card out and spend a few grand for gawds sake.

Mr Tibbs

Merry Crimbo by the way!

Did that this time last year.......and then went back to the 14's. A reverse mullett I grant you but it sounds damn fine!

Merry Crimbo to you too Mr Tibbs (sounds positively Dickensian!) G
 
Did that this time last year.......and then went back to the 14's. A reverse mullett I grant you but it sounds damn fine!

They do have a certain something I must admit, but what ultimately spoiled them for me was that I ended up not playing some of the music I like best.

Mr Tibbs
 
They do have a certain something I must admit, but what ultimately spoiled them for me was that I ended up not playing some of the music I like best.

Mr Tibbs

Nothing has tripped them up with me yet but I'd be interested to see if I can catch them out.

Any clues as to what you couldn't play and why? G
 
Nothing has tripped them up with me yet but I'd be interested to see if I can catch them out.

Any clues as to what you couldn't play and why? G

Well, a lot depends on your personal trip-up-o-meter doesn't it?

An extreme example of where they fail the test badly is practically anything by ZZ Top. They can't do the scale or loudness or clarity at the volume required to make that trio sound as effortlessly tight, rhythmic and lyrical as they do.

There are much less obvious occasions when they don't IMO cut it particularly well and leave me feeling shortchanged. Take something like Fagan's The Nightfly; Here we have an album where ES14s can appear to be in their element, but then when I hear it via a speaker that can really do bass well, I realise I missed the fact that the bass playing actually drives the whole album from start to finish. Even though the bass line is mostly still present via the 14s, it doesn't have the pep and presence I think is needed to make the album come to life.

Mr Tibbs
 
This is where I think we can't be hearing the same things.

On loud rock like Porcupine Tree 'Strip the Soul' they go really loud and stay in control. On Sacre du Printemps they handle the huge dynamic swings with ease. One listener at my bake off last year said he had never heard such scale and dynamics before.

On The Nightfly the bass punches along really well and I can hear what the bass is doing all the way through.
 
A superb bit of very glossy production from Mr Fagen, a favourite dem record for many as it sounds good on anything!

Same goes for the super slick Gaucho and Aja. ;)
 
No zzzzz top in the collection but will spin 'nightfly' and report back. Playing Lindsey Buckingham Live at Bass Performance Hall just now and he is in the room. Second Hand News is propelling along loud and fully under control. It is 'awesome' to use a horrible Americanism. Fantastically engineered disc. G



Well, a lot depends on your personal trip-up-o-meter doesn't it?

An extreme example of where they fail the test badly is practically anything by ZZ Top. They can't do the scale or loudness or clarity at the volume required to make that trio sound as effortlessly tight, rhythmic and lyrical as they do.

There are much less obvious occasions when they don't IMO cut it particularly well and leave me feeling shortchanged. Take something like Fagan's The Nightfly; Here we have an album where ES14s can appear to be in their element, but then when I hear it via a speaker that can really do bass well, I realise I missed the fact that the bass playing actually drives the whole album from start to finish. Even though the bass line is mostly still present via the 14s, it doesn't have the pep and presence I think is needed to make the album come to life.

Mr Tibbs
 
This is where I think we can't be hearing the same things.

On loud rock like Porcupine Tree 'Strip the Soul' they go really loud and stay in control. On Sacre du Printemps they handle the huge dynamic swings with ease. One listener at my bake off last year said he had never heard such scale and dynamics before.

On The Nightfly the bass punches along really well and I can hear what the bass is doing all the way through.

I can only assume the obvious - you haven't heard this music over a speaker that is significantly better at doing scale and maintaining absolute clarity while playing loudly. If you had then you'd know exactly what I'm banging on about. Same goes for the bake off listener.

No zzzzz top in the collection but will spin 'nightfly' and report back. Playing Lindsey Buckingham Live at Bass Performance Hall just now and he is in the room. Second Hand News is propelling along loud and fully under control. It is 'awesome' to use a horrible Americanism. Fantastically engineered disc. G

See above. By all means spin Nightfly, but the effect here is much subtler therefore won't be particularly illuminating, plus you'll be focusing on the bass line and will hear the significance of it now. What struck me about Nightfly was that I'd never found it that interesting via the ES14s, but didn't know why at the time.

Anyway, if you guys are enjoying your ES14s (and clearly you are) then long may it continue. It could be that I just never managed to get them to work as well as it appears you have.

Mr Tibbs
 
Mr Tibbs re. Nightfly. You certainly make a valid point in that the bass is there and tuneful, but it by no means drives the music along. Polite and musical on the 14 and so I can concede that something with more ' deft heft ' might be required to fully appreciate the recording. Saying that Ruby Ruby is sounding wonderful as I type and is 'plummier' than the S600 I last played this on.

Are you listening to cd or vinyl? G
 


advertisement


Back
Top