onlyconnect
pfm Member
Your second para seems potentially plausible to me. But I confess that as a non-Doze person I'm a tad puzzled by an OS that renders CPUs 'sightly less stable'.
Have the normal binary logic functions like AND, NOR, etc, now been supplimented with new ones like MAYBE, WHY-NOT-AS-ITS-POETS-DAY, etc?
Here's the post.
There's some dodgy use of stats IMO. For example:
"Devices that do not meet the minimum system requirements had 52% more kernel mode crashes. Devices that do meet the minimum system requirements had a 99.8% crash free experience."
A casual reading is that you see 99.8% vs 52%, huge. But they are measuring different things. We are not told what percentage of these non-conforming systems had a "crash free experience", plus for all we know crashes might be because of actual faults such as overheating - more common on older kit because of things like vents blocked by dust and failing fans. This sort of sleight of hand makes me thing the second reason was more significant.
Tim