2 amps that measure the same or similar, (pick any arbitrary parameter to measure) can and almost always do sound markedly different.
Yes.And do these 'differences' remain when you don't know which amp you're listening to?
No it's not.
For example?There are different aspects to fidelity.
This isn't implied. If there were 'different aspects to fidelity' then we could certainly qualify and rank them objectively.You might not be able to have them all so you have to take your pick of a balance of compromises which is subjective.
All amplifiers: clearly not. But surely the claim (that some other posters believe 'all amps sound the same') doesn't mean that; it's meant in the Peter Walker sense.your opening questions are opposites obviously but kind of miss the point i was making.....
i asked a simple question regarding the common assumption that a few posters on pfm think that some other posters believe 'all amps sound the same' .....now as far as we have gone in this topic not a single user has said all amps sound the same....some have even postulated that it is possible for 2 identical amps to sound and even possibly measure different due to component level variables.
the only point of me asking the question was to find out if people who accuse others of blindly believing all amps sound the same then we would find out who they were.
but there are not any pfm members who agree with the premise in my opening question.
i do hope this clears up any confusion.
regards.
d.
The degree of difference is at least partially proportional to how well trained the listeners ears are.
You lot need therapy. The electronics are but a tiny part of what you hear and so by rote, so are any measurements you make. 2 amps that measure the same or similar, (pick any arbitrary parameter to measure) can and almost always do sound markedly different. The degree of difference is at least partially proportional to how well trained the listeners ears are.
No, but I listen to/test an awful lot of diverse hifi equipment. I have been involved in hifi since the 60s and know some of the hifi "gurus". Some people also use my system as a reference when developing/evaluating stuff.hi barry,
do you play any instruments or do any audio engineering like recording, mixing or mastering ?
Does this mean if something doesn't measure well, it will likely sound bad?If something measures well it will likely sound good but this is by no means certain so subjective listening is still necessary.
No, but I listen to/test an awful lot of diverse hifi equipment. I have been involved in hifi since the 60s and know some of the hifi "gurus". Some people also use my system as a reference when developing/evaluating stuff.
You don't half state the bleeding obvious. Were you short-changed at birth, or later on in life?We are not born equal.
If it measures badly, it will be less "accurate". Whether this sounds "bad" is another matter.Does this mean if something doesn't measure well, it will likely sound bad?
If not, what's the connection?
Not at all. A solid objective performance is a good starting position. The question remains, 'which' objective measures matter.If it measures badly, it will be less "accurate". Whether this sounds "bad" is another matter.
Are you suggesting that designers should make no attempt to achieve "good" (some arbitrary standard easily achieved decades ago) objective performance?
Darrylcan i ask who and roughly what gear you have as i am curious as you sound like you are in a similar position to me, we may have even met as i used to be in the trade....
However, I can easily believe that many well designed amps ARE effectively indistinguishable in blind tests.