No, I don't think it's interesting or edifying at all. We know what the Kremlin line is, we hear it every day. How would you feel about having a rational and enlightening conversation with, for example, a Holocaust denier?
It's up to you (how much crap are you prepared to take) but I appreciate the fact that you are here, even though I fundamentally diagree with Putin's invasion of Ukraine.Cancel Russian culture and Russian
Dehumanization of all Russians (you are here)
Eliminate all the Russians
Well said. I expect many members would have similar beliefs, had they been raised in Russia. The idea that people magically change their minds when exposed to evidence that goes against their entrenched views is a fantasy. It's not how most people work - if anything they often dig, epecially if they are also accused of being a troll, a bot, or told to **** off.Because he's just an ordinary bloke like us who happens to live in Moscow? If I lived in Russia there's a good chance I would hold similar views. Would that make me a scumbag? Are the majority of Russians who support the war scumbags? They're not monsters who support rape and torture - they simply don't believe the Russian military are the perpetrators.
I'd prefer to think of it not so much as treading on eggshells as remaining friendly and civil with a fellow member regardless of whether or not I think they're correct.
Again, I agree. With the qualification that I would not expect nor wish to have such a discussion with a committed, ideological Nazi. I don't know how many German citizens fell into that category at the time (probably a much debated topic) but I'd like to think that millions just wanted to get on with their lives, like any normal human being.If the internet had been around in 1940 I'd hope it might be possible to have a civil discussion with a German hi-fi nerd regardless of their view of the war.
No, I don't think it's interesting or edifying at all. We know what the Kremlin line is, we hear it every day. How would you feel about having a rational and enlightening conversation with, for example, a Holocaust denier?
A very good article in last week's Economist on the politics of paranoia:I have 'interesting' (if not entirely edifying) conversations with an individual in my extended family circle who believes that most of the ailments in the modern world are down to the US (and the UK), that we only ever get a carefully curated set of Western ideologies imposed upon us by our media - and seriously believes Putin isn't anywhere as bad as we all think.
His logic and reasoning is full of holes - and quite frankly bullish*t - but I am always curious to try to understand what drives his thinking.
That's the same reason why I think it's worth hearing what somebody like poster [email protected] has to say. Even if it's bull - I'd like to know what his reasoning is, and why he has reached those conclusions. If we don't take the time to understand the mindset and reasoning of 'the opposition', then it's hard to deal with their arguments.
(And for the absolute removal of doubt btw - nothing I have heard from anywhere up to this point has done anything to convince me that Putin's actions, if not his whole mindset, are anything less than absolutely fkn disgraceful.)
It's up to you (how much crap are you prepared to take) but I appreciate the fact that you are here, even though I fundamentally diagree with Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
Frankly, some of the posts attacking you (and making sweeping, dehumanising generalisations about Russians) are digusting.
I don't agree that I need to research a source before posting.Easy to find out more about the source before offering it to others.
That doesn't change my opinion that there were interesting points in the article I linked to.Anybody who broadcasts that Scripals' Novichok attack was "food poisoning" (resulted in near death of the targets, death of a British citizen and multiple injuries) should not be promoted.
Please stop the fake violins.Cancel Russian culture and Russian
Dehumanization of all Russians (you are here)
Eliminate all the Russians
I don't agree that I need to research a source before posting.
…
Excuse me, but have you been in a coma?I don't agree that I need to research a source before posting.
That doesn't change my opinion that there were interesting points in the article I linked to.
Interesting that you point out the Scripals incident - its been a while since I've seen anything written about that. Think they were both hospitalised but recovered iirc - where did they go to afterwards. I'd think the daughter would return to her family/ partner in Russia, even if the father would likely go into hiding.
I remember at the time thinking there was some UK/Western propaganda in the media portrayal of it and the aftermath.
It certainly didn't feel as clear cut as the poor guy who was poisoned with (I think) Polonium in a London hotel.
I thought you'd fvcked off. Yet here you are, back with your tedious and intelligence-insulting circular arguments. How about reconsidering the sex and travel option?
Where are all these sweeping, dehumanising generalisations?
You're welcomeGood to know. Makes ignoring your posts much easier. Thank you.
Excuse me, but have you been in a coma?
Scripals are in hiding. The two Russian GRU men who poisoned them were on many video clips from Sulisberry streets before flying back. They then went on RT and claimed they were nutritionists and went to Sulisberry to enjoy it's cathedral.
They then threw bottle of Novichok disguised as perfume into or near a donation box. It eventually found its way to a woman who used it on her wrist and died. Others around the incident were injured and hospitalized.
I don't think it's smart to post junk without checking it.