Nic Robinson
Moderator
Not much compared to many another ICE vehicle.And still be pumping CO2 into the atmosphere. But he saved a few quid so that’s all that matters.
Not much compared to many another ICE vehicle.And still be pumping CO2 into the atmosphere. But he saved a few quid so that’s all that matters.
And still be pumping CO2 into the atmosphere. But he saved a few quid so that’s all that matters.
I’m kicking myself for clicking in the first place and putting more money in his pocket.Maybe you should watch the whole thing.
This makes zero sense. You’re grasping. Why would he drive 3x as far because he owns an EV?He could be doing 10K miles a year and keep it for 10 years vs an EV user doing 30K a year with a new one every 2. Who’s worse for the planet?
This makes zero sense. You’re grasping. Why would he drive 3x as far because he owns an EV?
Pardon..?EVs with more weight may be less efficient than smaller ones, but either is objectively more efficient than any EV. The numbers are clear.
But more than an EV. Any CO2 emitted will be around for thousands of years.Not much compared to many another ICE vehicle.
We are talking about someone who ditched an EV to buy a brand spanking new diesel SUV that will continue to burn diesel for 30 years (even if he doesn’t own it that long). How does that get us closer to net zero?Because people are different. I fully accept that EV’s can be great for the right person with the right use case. Can you not accept the same might be true for ICE vehicles?
F-Pace: WLTP 0.8m/kWhPardon..?
We are talking about someone who ditched an EV to buy a brand spanking new diesel SUV that will continue to burn diesel for 30 years (even if he doesn’t own it that long). How does that get us closer to net zero?
Well you’d be wrong. After a small portion of an EVs life it is net zero if powered by renewables.It doesn’t, but neither does any form of personal transport IMHO.
Let's run those figures.it’s a rounding error
Your post says that either EV is more efficient than an EV.F-Pace: WLTP 0.8m/kWh
iPace 2.8m/kWh
As I said, the numbers do not lie.
Eh? No, it doesn't.Your post says that either EV is more efficient than an EV.
it’s a rounding error which I’m not going to get bent out of shape over.
Let's run those figures.
10k miles will be between 8-12,000 kWh per year. Our entire energy usage for running a house, heating and hot water is less than that.
Except you post more than most on this thread constantly criticising EV at every opportunity, you sound very bent out of shape.
Assuming you run an ICE vehicle how much energy is it, or would it be, using to do 10k miles?10k miles will be between 8-12,000 kWh per year. Our entire energy usage for running a house, heating and hot water is less than that.