I've no doubt I can also improve my posting style, but the reason I put you on ignore some considerable time ago was your habit, as above, of accusing me of deliberate misrepresentation from incorrect inferences. I have little doubt that this reply to mine was another such.
I have said many times to you that if I have misinterpreted a post, then this is never deliberate. The fault may be mine, or it may be a post which didn't clearly make its point, but the accusation of deliberately misunderstanding so as to troll, is offensive. You have never accepted this, apparently preferring to consider nobody could ever misunderstand your posts, which are self-evidently blameless. You accused me of this so often it obliged me to put you on ignore as defending myself against these accusations was spoiling my enjoyment of the discussions on here.
But in the spirit of this thread's OP, I'd like to re-engage - I think you make some worthwhile points and I'm sure I miss some interesting insights. But I will not tolerate your refusal to accept that if I misunderstand a point, I am not doing so in bad faith. If you're happy to wipe the slate clean, then so am I.