pfm Picture A Week (PAW) 2008 part II

[Mick P]

Ceaser

The scruffy boy is bloody good.


Cliff

The Barbican shot is ultra good.

Regards

Mick

 

[cliffpatte]

Cheers Mick and Concrete (Barbican is Northbank and up a bit )

 

[cliffpatte]

Ducks ...

 

[vuk]

cliff.

you went to see the ducks in my pond but did drop by the house to say hi?

vuk.

 

[dan m]

more on flickr

 

[concrete]

nice dan

cliff--oops!

 

[omers]

Thanks for the Wisteria Cliff

 

[RichardH]

One for vuk...

Some of the other Bokeh shots I decided against

Quite like the daubs of colour from the tumbledown house in the background on this one

 

[cliffpatte]

Vuk, its Dulwich park, South London. There is a Dulwich set on my flickr page www.flickr.com/cliffpatte/sets

 

[omers]

ok Richard now I get the whole picture, they use rabbits and Pandas to pull airplanes

 

[Cesare]

Richard, like your fence/house shot. I think that works really well.

Cesare

 

[dan m]

Thanks concrete!

 

[vuk]

ugly picture for youknowwho and youknowwho...

vuk.

 

[vuk]

omer's favourite witch:

vuk.

 

[Anex]

Nice

 

[vuk]

the last of the odds and ends (i have a set i'm still working on of the real thing) ...

vuk.

 

[concrete]

vuk i have to say i haven't thought either of your 'ugly' pictures were even close to your usual quality. are you just trying to prove that good pictures can't be taken of ugly things?

 

[vuk]

concrete.

i'm just f*cking around.

btw--unlike a lot of people, i am happy to have the view decide the entire experience of looking at a photo.


vuk.

 

[concrete]

concrete.

i'm just f*cking around.

btw--unlike a lot of people, i am happy to have the view decide the entire experience of looking at a photo.


vuk.

fair enough.

if that's the case, what purpose do your titles serve?

 

[vuk]

if that's the case, what purpose do your titles serve?

#1 identification

#2 they are what i see in the picture (related to #1)

#3 a bit of fun with gallery patrons looking for meaning in art


vuk.