@cooky1257 Did you perhaps hear two things rolled into one? The Finnish parliament is pretty much equal: 47% of MPs are female. However, the current Finnish
government is unusual in having more female members than male - that 63% doesn't sound wrong. I'd be worried if that became a persistent feature, but as an overshoot, it's fine. The goal isn't to enforce a strict 51:49% ratio, it's to ensure that capable male or female candidates are not being excluded from parliament simply because they're male or female.
That is, however, only your opinion. I'd argue that most changes have been to the better, but with regression in some areas. In the area of better treatment of women (this topic), I think it's hard to argue that things today are worse overall now than 50 years ago. I'm speaking about Western Europe, where I live, rather than the USA, where most of this rhetoric seems to come from.
Execpt that that's not what the
idea of diversity is about at all. While there are a few ignorant blowhards who've decided to appoint themselves as champions of diversity, that doesn't make the simple idea that we all have to share this place with everyone a bad one.
Some people don't like the idea of sharing because they see the world as a zero-sum game where you can't gain unless someone else also loses. That's simplistic, and it's wrong (and it suggests a mindset where you don't produce anything of value to gain wealth, but rather take it from someone else).
I steer clear of social media: it's full of people who would rather be right than helpful. The world isn't perfect, and never will be. We can accept that and work towards making things better, actively oppose that in a misguided attempt to keep our own little share, or sit and bitch and do nothing of value; I find too many of the latter two groups on social media.