Rega amps are a solid choice if you put music first over hifiisms such as imaging, air, space, soundstaging etc etc..Most of their amp designs are derived from 60's technology, they always put music to the fore.Hey, I'm all for interesting banter and advice.
What are the clangers you speak of, lets go over them so we can be sure of the problems I think some things I mentioned have also been aired by others. As I reiterate I think there can be more than one point of view on some of these matters, especially when we get to fringe subjectives. PRaT is a terrible name, it certainly doesn't help in these matters either.
BTW it's entirely likely I'll buy an amp like the Rega, if not the exact Rega. Never questioned it was a bad choice, not for a second. Or asked you to justify it or prove your opinion has value because of your personal background.
Me tooQuite... But what a shame. I want to hear about the aliens too!
Rega amps are a solid choice if you put music first over hifiisms such as imaging, air, space, soundstaging etc etc..Most of their amp designs are derived from 60's technology, they always put music to the fore.
I'm currently trying to get mine back as I miss it so much & seriously regret selling it.
I had a Rega Brio 2000 then a Brio 3, both were wonderfully musical amps. Something just feels right about the sound, hard to put your finger on it.What one do you have?
Sorry dude. Your clearly a smart chap and pretty much everything you say is logical and makes sense, and in fact thinking it through it makes me sympathise with people like John West who constantly say they have a hard time acknowledging audible differences that they can't reasonably explain with all their years of experience creating and designing audio gear etc.
Imagine being an audio engineer and hearing differences in cables. What do you do? Admit your experience? Instant career suicide. I have no opinion on this, although I am doubtful I can't force my view on anyone because I have no practical way of backing it up. That said, if cables really do make a difference, then against all the resistance I'd like to hear about it.
Also, the Rega is great but my advice is deffo hear it. I've flown the flag for Rega a bit but it doesn't mean they are the best. They are great, and they were behind the amp that made the difference in my journey, but I wouldn't want you to make an ultimate choice of Rega without hearing a bunch of other stuff just in case! I've tried to be careful to not say it's what you should get, but rather say my experience was excellent and enlightening, but honestly I would suggest that the kind of people worth listening to are not the likes of me anyway. I just want to pass on what I wish people would have told me years ago, and that is that audiophiles aren't all more money than sense brigade, some of the weird foo stuff seems to exist, probably even prat. The problem with prat seems to be no one agrees what it is, or they're offended by it as a marketing term.
Anyway, I sort of regret posting the last post and this is way off topic so I'll apologise and say no more. No hard feelings mate and the offer is genuine if you ever are if the area! I'll even provide tea and biscuits (or beer and pork scratchings) The LSA amp is truly something else but I think probably the Rega is where the most bang for buck is.
I had a Rega Brio 2000 then a Brio 3, both were wonderfully musical amps. Something just feels right about the sound, hard to put your finger on it.
If I had the money I would go for the newer Brio-r, this is a superb amp, sounds much more powerful than it's 100 watts suggest, I could heartily recommend it if your looking at this brand. You can get hold of them for as little £275 in some cases which is great value.
There was one on here a little while back, it may have been sold but worth a look if you decide to try one.
I wonder if anyone actually determined whether or not Japanese amps really do PRAT or not? I feel a bit sorry for the OP.
Thanks. I sympathise with your point, generally.
However, to me, it doesn't matter if KHF runs a biggest hi-shop in the galaxy.
In fact, to me that just says; vested interest...
I do not need to prove my knowledge to you guys and gals. I'll just have my say, just like you do.
I don't ask you to prove who you are in order you can express an opinion.
Although, fwiw I do have valid credentials, but frankly none of your business. I don't have any vested interests at all.
I'm not trying to sell you anything.
Amazing how touchy people get about domestic music reproduction gear. There are reasons why people touchy.
It's OK to have a different opinion, especially when you get to the esoteric all ill-defined subject of things like PRaT. I've expressed what I think about it. Rather than criticise me for it, how about spend the time to make a well argued case for the contrary point. Or accept that different views can exist.
(yes, I've also been listening, critically, to music, all of my life. It is not a competition!)
I wonder if anyone actually determined whether or not Japanese amps really do PRAT or not? I feel a bit sorry for the OP.
One thing guaranteed, the phono section on any Rega amp is first class & will bring out the best in any turntable, it is what they are all about. Check out their website, the guy who owns Rega makes these things for fun, honestly, making money comes secondary as their lack of advertising shows.Very interesting. I love british Hi-fi, what's left of it.
In my short list of new amps I have the Rega (Elicit-R) as one of the top contenders right now. I've just been holding fire on a purchase while I soak up as much info as possible.
I'm also holding out to ideally find a used one, I can wait as the sound I have now is far from awful, but I may impulsively just go get one. We'll see. The Rega and also the Creek and Croft amps I find very appealing. I've looked also at CA, BAT, Roksan, Quad, McIntosh and Bryston to mention a few but I think I'd be happy with a Rega amp at that price point. So long as it doesn't get 'the hump' at being connected to my Project turntable hehe.
Hence threads like this I do find interesting, to hear peoples views on what works and what does not. While prat is a bad acronym for me, I have little doubt some amps are much more subjectively musical and pleasant to listen to than others.
LouisB, I seem to remember your expertise is in software? This would explain the rather terse communication style. Fwiw I suspect finkaudio's problem is more to do with the style of your assertions than their substance.
One thing guaranteed, the phono section on any Rega amp is first class & will bring out the best in any turntable, it is what they are all about. Check out their website, the guy who owns Rega makes these things for fun, honestly, making money comes secondary as their lack of advertising shows.
Your last sentence makes so much sense.Interesting point! So not to hijack and go further off topic but it's an integral part of some british amps, so...
So I'm using a MM (Ortofon 2M black, love it) and a PhonoBox RS.
The phonobox RS is really good although sometimes I wonder about how ruthlessly clinical it can be, it allows no where to hide it seems.
If the Rega has a comparable phono stage or better, I could sell the RS and put the money to the amp, making it an even cheaper upgrade.
Still, I'm quite a fan of separate boxes dedicated to a specific task, like the external preamp, also it's independently upgradable later. However, there's also something to be said for what can be achieved by careful integration within a single box by a single designer.
Interesting thought though, I guess I'd have to get the amp, compare internal and external phonostages and go from there. The RS is over £600 alone, so it's a big part of the £1500 elicit-r budget, but cost vs. quality are not entirely correlated variables, of course.
If FinkAudio is who I fink they are ..arf arf.....
My question is, what is PRAT? Can some one define it in plain tangible language LPSpinner
Rega barely say anything ever at all, and they only rate it at 105w's too. Very modest, so no PRAT terms. If I'm honest I still don't recognise the term myself, but the idea that amps only sound bad if they're poorly designed doesn't sit well with me as it was that advice, followed with many engineering logic based arguments that made me stick with the CA so long. Just from the recent upgrade to my LSA amp, I spent about £450 on parts alone to increase capacitance, better resistors etc etc so as basic as an amp is, it still requires expensive parts and well thought out design iterations (expensive minds, expensive trial and error) to make an advancement. If you're only copying another design, well then you still have the parts, the case to pay for.
Speakers are Dynaudio contour s1.4's. Little stand mounts. Don't appear like the kind of thing you'd need an amazing amp for by looking at them, but that said, even my crappy little Eltax speakers reveal the difference between the amp changes (although perhaps not the modification to the latest amp, and it's been too long for me to be able to tell now)
I'm no expert but I know what I've experienced, it's really obvious and I wish I knew before spending so much time enduring the situation. Worst case is I could have easily sold the speakers and never truly discovered them. I would have been ignorant and perhaps not realised but it's heart breaking to think that could have happened and probably I'd be going around saying that my experience of Dynaudio speakers were they were overpriced crap with dark flabby bass and lazy timing.
Interesting..
I imagine listening to some ProAc Response D-Two when you have the opportunity could be a nice comparison for you to the Dyn 1.4s.