I disagree; A-B testing may work for you, but the only thing I notice when changing kit is the difference. It needs considerable listening through all sources to evaluate those differences. I may be initially struck by more involvement factor or whatever, but proper discernment with many genres of music in addition to sources is needed; at least at the higher end, which we're discussing here.
A Case in point. When I replaced my top-of-the-range ProAc Response Fours with large Quad electrostatics, the DIFFERENCE was immediate, but it took a few months of becoming acclimatised to the least bass response I've had in many decades but the most transparent and fast mid and treble. Only when I reverted to the ProAcs did I realise that the bass I'd cherished for 50 years was not really so important !
Thats the niggle usually when one auditions new audio its in a limited time, to get accustomed to a new sound I myself should 'live' with the new amplifier or whatever. Only then will I truly know or experience the new or different sound, I sometimes wonder how reviewers could describe the sound (but then most of them confirm they have lived and burned in the rewiewed component).
For me, by far the biggest shift was how long I wanted to listen to music. With the Naim, I rarely got past one album. With the Vitus I was losing sleep due to late night listening.
Not to mine either but, hey, it's different and folk want different. Vive le difference. Things are only expensive if you can't afford them or you prefer the sound of something cheaper.That's not my experience, Naim is quite addictive and pleasing musically to my ears. I can listen all day to my Naim amps.
It's not like Vitus is a alternative to Naim, it is extremely expensive, more than Naim.
And when I heard a Vitus setup, I wasn't too impressed either, nothing special at all to my ears.
Not to mine either but, hey, it's different and folk want different. Vive le difference. Things are only expensive if you can't afford them or you prefer the sound of something cheaper.
Of course, this is about the comparison and consideration for change between Naim and Vitus, both being solid state. The o.p., to my recollection, is going from a relatively lowly Naim combo to something higher up the scale, as Vitus prices start at a higher level.
Going from Naim to a well-chosen valve outfit would effect a definite presentational change, even if 'Naim-like' E.A.R. is chosen. This would be much less costly, too. Valves are not everybody's cup of tea, but (unless Vitus adds something extra) I could neither revert to Naim or in fact to solid state Mind you, valves and DIY 'Eidolons (?) may not gel, and amplification matching with speakers is pretty important, i.m.o.
I am considering a valve option in my short list of replacements for the Vitus.
Hmm...relatively lowly? In terms of quality, or price...or general opinion perhaps?
Let's look then at the equivalent modern prices for these items (new not secondhand).
I replaced :
Nac 82 - modern equivalent 282 = £ 4,500
Nap 135 x 2 - modern equivalent V145 x 2 = £5,600
Teddy Supercap = £1,400 (add nearly £2,000 to that if opting for a Naim Supercap)
Total price (approx) = "11,500 (or about £13,500 with Naim SC)
with....
1 X Vitus Audio RI-100 = £9.500
Now because I am not that well off...I bought all my gear at secondhand prices...and my Naim items were pushing 20 years old...although all were serviced. But it's not easy to try and equate prices of used equipment...so a new equivalent comparison is the easiest option.
As they say....do the math....
And my "DIY" Eidolons....individually designed and built to an impeccable standard and most assuredly sound at least as good as and possibly even better than a pair of originals.
Apart from all that...I agree with much of what you say...and personally, I am a lover of valve amps too, having been weaned on them so to speak. In fact, I am considering a valve option in my short list of replacements for the Vitus.
Hmm...relatively lowly? In terms of quality, or price...or general opinion perhaps?
Let's look then at the equivalent modern prices for these items (new not secondhand).
I replaced :
Nac 82 - modern equivalent 282 = £ 4,500
Nap 135 x 2 - modern equivalent V145 x 2 = £5,600
Teddy Supercap = £1,400 (add nearly £2,000 to that if opting for a Naim Supercap)
Total price (approx) = "11,500 (or about £13,500 with Naim SC)
with....
1 X Vitus Audio RI-100 = £9.500
Now because I am not that well off...I bought all my gear at secondhand prices...and my Naim items were pushing 20 years old...although all were serviced. But it's not easy to try and equate prices of used equipment...so a new equivalent comparison is the easiest option.
As they say....do the math....
And my "DIY" Eidolons....individually designed and built to an impeccable standard and most assuredly sound at least as good as and possibly even better than a pair of originals.
Apart from all that...I agree with much of what you say...and personally, I am a lover of valve amps too, having been weaned on them so to speak. In fact, I am considering a valve option in my short list of replacements for the Vitus.
Sorry, Andy, I didn't realise it came across like that.I'm well aware of the quality of your speakers (as per originals, prob.). Should have said 'alternative' rather than 'DIY' !
Despite going up to 552/135s from 42/110 donkeys' years ago before changing, the 82 is only about half-way up. Power supplies do bump things up, though; box count as well !. I thought that ALL Vitus stuff was way above £10K, though.
I do have a healthy interest in Vitus, and the fact that you're familiar with valved kit means that your take on things after the trial will be well anticipated.
"It's not like Vitus is a alternative to Naim, it is extremely expensive, more than Naim"
Have you not looked at the latest Naim price list.