Roog
pfm Member
This presumably rhetorical question has been asked several times in this thread.
I'm curious, it seems relevant to me, and no I have not read the whole thread.
This presumably rhetorical question has been asked several times in this thread.
This seems to settle the question. I have two points of puzzlement though:Excellent video, but a red rag to the subjectivist diehards.
Your comment is interesting. Looking back at my personal notebook from 2004 when I auditioned some CD players, they all sounded fine except one about whose sound I wrote "glassy". However, I haven't ever heard "glassy" from any of my systems - regardless of the networking arrangement.
I did drop that CD player from my short list just in case that defect which I had to listen for (so quite small relative to my "Steinway piano sound" scale) might annoy me after having recognized it; even when listening to music rather than listening to equipment.
Nope, I'm not talking about DSP or whatever from different servers, players, whatever. No need to confuse the question. Hence the phrase, all things being equal, that means the same, constants, which one needs to be able to isolate the variable/effect. Simple experimental procedure.
With everything the same apart from the network switch changing, play a piece of audio, capture the output. Then, with not changing anything else, change the switch, play the same piece of audio, capture the output. Subtract the first capture from the second and post the graph or table of variance here.
And do that at least ten times, a small sample, but hey, better that doing it just once!
Honestly that simple...go for it...
Oh, and record the system in test, the configs the devices, etc so the test is repeatable.
This seems to settle the question. I have two points of puzzlement though:
1. Why has this thread continued for 45 more pages?
2. What happened to the post from Purité Audio that gave this link originally: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...twork-switches-make-a-difference-video.20316/
So for me switches don't seem to work, is that me, my ethernet or my streamer?
Well that's cool with me, knock yourself out, but don't cite the network switch phenomena as fact unless there some measurements; opinion and hearsay until then, which is probably how all great scientific discoveries are started, only they went on and generated some hard evidence to back the observation. With the network switch swap it is going to need some repeatable evidence to back up opinion.This is all fine but what I seem to have missed is why I should want to do any of it if I am perfectly happy and content with the audible results of what I have done to my system. The system sounded great before but to my mind it sounds even better now. End of really except that if you are ever in the area you are most welcome to pop in have a listen and a natter and maybe even some local Stilton cheese..
.
The artifacts I was describing are slightly to barely audible in most cases. That is why I wrote that ultimately it's down to the end user to decide if it's worth trying to address them. And they can be made worse or negligible depending on the partnering amplification and electronics.
It is like all of these 'fix-it' type products, do any of these people know if there was a problem to be fixed in the first place?
I'm curious, it seems relevant to me, and no I have not read the whole thread.
@Fourlegs, No one is stating that should do anything to your hifi that you don't want to do. If you'd rather follow flights of fancy than good engineering, have at it.
But when someone posts the question, do audiophile switches really work, then you can expect to see some people chipping in with ideas and opinions based on science and measurement just like you get people chipping in saying they like what they hear, based solely on listening.
If it’s audible, you can hear it. It’s a dictionary definition thing. Come round for a cuppa.Well, if they are audible, let's see the FFT of them.
Well, if they are audible, let's see the FFT of them.
Unless there is some 'bad blood' in a particular case for some cause that seems an unnecessary norm. Often when I was more active in audio discussions on AudioKarma I and others would reference resources available elsewhere, which was often quite helpful.Isn't it bad form to link to another Audio forum? Seems reasonable to me.
Are you suggesting the factor which differentiates facts from assertions is the presence or absence of measurements? Or did you mean the presence or absence of evidence?Well that's cool with me, knock yourself out, but don't cite the network switch phenomena as fact unless there some measurements; opinion and hearsay until then, which is probably how all great scientific discoveries are started, only they went on and generated some hard evidence to back the observation.
This is a fair point with which I have sympathy.Unless there is some 'bad blood' in a particular case for some cause that seems an unnecessary norm. Often when I was more active in audio discussions on AudioKarma I and others would reference resources available elsewhere, which was often quite helpful.
Sounds to me like not welcome to some and welcome to others. Which is a lot like 'not always welcome,' as you said, so we agree!This is a fair point with which I have sympathy.
I think the forum in question has a deserved rep for being a bit of a cult which, to parallel a view expressed recently about subjectivism, has become an echo chamber where dissenting voices are quickly killed off and measurement is the one true god which must be praised. That’s fine if that’s your religion, but bringing it here isn’t always welcome.
If you capture the before and after signals and send them to meAs I have previously mentioned, I suspect low level but still audible IM distortion artefacts as opposed to frequency response variations or overlaid audio band noise. But no, I am not going to pursue that mainly because I don’t have the right kit to measure it. Do you?