TBH it's all utter bollocks
IMO she's been lying through her back teeth about a lot of this; all in line to get as much money out of this situation as she can. There have been too many holes and too many 'maybes' in all this, from my perspective
Lost the picture? Bollocks...
Sorry; but it reeks of bullshit and lies to me...
Is Andrew guilty? No idea; I haven't seen or read enough proof to say he is. He's been a tit about this, going on TV was the stupidest thing he could have done, ever
Is he innocent? No idea either, but she's clearly manipulative and knows that if she aired this as much as she could; she was always going to get a good payday out of it...
It's brought shame on the Royals and that's unfortunate; they've had to distance themselves from him and that's him done now in that sense...
Once anyone or anything gets to the stage it can be ridiculed as above it’s over, surely? I don’t see how the whole concept of “royalty” can emerge from this without carrying forward the stench of child-rape, association with human traffickers, and buying off its victims. UK “royalty” was always an entity built of blood, violence and wealth via conquest, but Andrew has brought it bang up to date. Charles looks to be adding corruption to it too. How very modern/Conservative!
It does not say anything of substance other than the usual "we believe blah blah" and "a source close to the deal suggests...."Try the Times
Wow, that's a particularly rose-tinted view. They've known (The Royals) that he was a wrong 'un all his life. This is no different to the Catholic Church and their complicity in the actions of their priests; they are complicit.
I agree. He’s awful and in my opinion likely to have done some very distasteful things. However comments linking him to paedophilia do not appear to have foundation. Anything is possible but let’s not get too carried away. For sure his association with Epstein looks very bad. We can say the same for the likes of Bill Clinton and Trump too…. Maybe there’s a deep conspiracy…No its not
Not in one thought have I ever though he's innocent; but neither have I thought he's guilty... Exactly what I wrote
Nowt rose-tinted about it at all; simply my opinion
This is true, and using the Paedo slur is unhelpful. Having sex with underage girls is bad enough that we don't need to associate it with the, far worse, crimes of paedophilia.I agree. He’s awful and in my opinion likely to have done some very distasteful things. However comments linking him to paedophilia do not appear to have foundation. Anything is possible but let’s not get too carried away. For sure his association with Epstein looks very bad. We can say the same for the likes of Bill Clinton and Trump too…. Maybe there’s a deep conspiracy…
Only if the perpetrator is male.Last time I looked having sex with an underage girl is rape.
Well there’s linking and there’s linking. He has definite links to paedophilia inasmuch as he was happy to associate himself with a convicted sex offender and someone of whose behaviour, it’s difficult to imagine, he was unaware. And he’s not the first member of the royal family to attract allegations of this nature.I agree. He’s awful and in my opinion likely to have done some very distasteful things. However comments linking him to paedophilia do not appear to have foundation. Anything is possible but let’s not get too carried away.