Here we go from front page of on-line Guardian site and took 5 seconds to find.. as usual... https://www.theguardian.com/global/...ple-children-suicide-bullying-rightwing-media
Yes it's still better than any other paper though over all.
It has been a major part of the massive anti-Corbyn propaganda campaign over the last few years.
Dump the Guardian!
The Guardian has spent the last two years relentlessly attacking Jeremy Corbyn.
Only recently has it changed its tune, perhaps worried that it has alienated too many readers. Corbyn's success has been despite the Guardian and the rest of the corporate media. The Guardian will now want readers to forget its propaganda war on Corbyn. We've compiled this list so they don't. Dump the Guardian!
http://theguardian.fivefilters.org/
Itll be Dacre and Blair as exec board members and a couple of disgruntled New Labour MPs with Isle of Man money transfers after Mogg and Redwood have passed the hat round their blue rinse howler clients.First thing I did was to WhoIs it, but whatever it is it is hidden behind a ‘Respect my privacy LLC’ registration, i.e. they don’t want you to know.
Best get your ear plugs dear or put nextflix on at the Bunker.He's right...any paper with a political agenda should fvck off. Or at least stop calling themselves newspapers. Won't leave many, I confess....
Most people here post links from the Guardian, like it is going to win people over. It's not, it's merely part of the PFM echo chamber.
You're defo a Guardian reader. I don't recall any posts with links but I know you through here well enough to place you as one of those right (sorry I mean left) in the middle of Guardianism. I can just picture you in the euphoric throes of retirement next year, trotting down those Edinburgh lanes on a cold and misty Sunday morning, stopping off at the newsagent for a copy of the Observer (my best mate used to write for them, interestingly), then down to the canopéed cafés for a full Scottish to while away the morning.Best get your ear plugs dear or put nextflix on at the Bunker.
They have it written somewhere that they offer a smidgeon of support for the government in power at the time. I am not sure how they got there exactly or how it is worded, but it makes sense that a state-funded organisation is not too belligerent. Their destruction (or empowerment) of Corbyn via Laura Cvntsberg has not helped their cause in my opinion. Too much support. But then again, the Guardian was doing the same thing. Strange times.what we need is a colour chart (red/green/blue/orange) to suggest where the media's sympathies lie.
I agree that some pretence at neutrality wouldbe nice, but I don't see much sign of it. I do think the beeb tried hard to retain impartiality for most of the 20th C, but now they appear to be 'pushed' by whoever is in power to present the chosen angle, so, govt puppets.
There is no neutral IMO.
Well for what it's worth my favourite has a dollop of haggis on it.You make a very good point- though there are interesting vernacular variations . You always get a bit of a surprise when the local version is put down to you.
I will get shot down for this, but the I and the BBC are more central than than the Guardian. It's only my opinion, and of course you are all entitled to it.
They are all pretty much in the same political area, the Guardian slightly to the left of centre, the BBC slightly to the right and the I probably somewhere between. You are very vocal about the Guardian which puzzles me given so many really extreme and nasty publications exist (Mail, Telegraph, Breitbart, Express, Sun etc etc). All of which very actively promote bigotry and division.
I’ll happily read the Guardian, I or FT, they are to my mind the only decent papers in the UK. The rest is just divisive hate-shit.
PS I haven’t mentioned The Times as it is so long since I’ve seen a copy I have no idea where it lies these days. Back in the ‘80s I used to buy the Sunday Times, but mainly because I preferred its, magazine, arts review section and TV guide!