Sue Pertwee-Tyr
Accuphase all the way down
The top is now a humongous unproductive sink for capital, and it appears impossible to change that short of a cataclysm.
A capitaclysm, perhaps?
The top is now a humongous unproductive sink for capital, and it appears impossible to change that short of a cataclysm.
Spot on. But you missed out the next step where the companies reduce labour cost by moving to eastern Europe; setting up with soft loans from the EIB (European Investment Bank). The UK makes a contriutionto the EIB.Not true - if one company within a business sector automates and can then undercut its competitors then they'll all be forced to do it because consumers buy the least expensive, quality being equal. Capitalism is in effect a race to the bottom, where only the "most productive" companies survive. Unfortunately "most productive" means fewer workers.
Look at what has happened in the last 20 years to living standards in India and China then.Sure, the capitalists are healthy. The world I'm not nearly so sure about.
Spot on. But you missed out the next step where the companies reduce labour cost by moving to eastern Europe; setting up with soft loans from the EIB (European Investment Bank). The UK makes a contriutionto the EIB.
Ah, then you don't know what will happen. You just know my conceptual-level idea-spinning is 'gobbledygook.' Well, I think much of traditional economics is gobbledygook, designed to say that whatever 'markets' can be made to do to pile wealth up at the top is 'right.'
How about a mass of cottage industries?
Do you already only buy Made in UK products ?
Yet we appear to be heading in the opposite direction. More state support for the greens, less for the other colours.
Stephen
Spot on. But you missed out the next step where the companies reduce labour cost by moving to eastern Europe;
Look at what has happened in the last 20 years to living standards in India and China then.
Look in your driveway and at the technology around your house. Compare that to what your parents had and tell me that markets only pile up benefits at the top. Markets are the best means for deciding what to make that's why even Marxists recognise that in a socialist society they would exist.
Indeed. Capitalism, for all its faults, has surely created the greatest migration out of poverty in the history of humankind.
Regulated capitalism. Therein lies the trick - capitalism has to be managed, regulated, taxed etc to make sure it benefits a majority of people.
Noone on this thread is saying we ditch capitalism completely, but that the direction in which it's taking us, and the calls for ever greater deregulation, are going to lead to massive inequality.
Capitalism applied to healthcare has produced the world's most expensive and one of the worst performing healthcare systems in terms of advanced nations.
Capitalism has been great for our wants - it has not done so well providing for many of our needs (education, healthcare, transportation, utilities).
This is a temporary move. Eventually these jobs will also be lost to automation, as will those in China and India.
Stephen
The redundant Italians , French and UK workers whose jobs have been relocated to eastern Europe using EU money may not agree with you, or find any consolation.
The redundant Italians , French and UK workers whose jobs have been relocated to eastern Europe using EU money may not agree with you, or find any consolation.
Indeed. Capitalism, for all its faults, has surely created the greatest migration out of poverty in the history of humankind.
As products become more complex it takes more capital investment to design them which must be amortized over greater unit sales - hence mergers and acquisitions. Mass cottage industry would only be possible if we went backward in technology - like Morgans for example.
I think I fully agree with that.