Mike Reed
pfm Member
I didn't mention a chronological order despite my 'bullet points' being so !Hands first as well. Even more impressive.
I didn't mention a chronological order despite my 'bullet points' being so !Hands first as well. Even more impressive.
I am not sure what your point is. Isn’t this a good thing? Apart from the way Russia can view it? It exposes the mess of US politics though, why fund all this and not supply ammo on time?lovely news from CIA that most of PFM will ignore
The Spy War: How the C.I.A. Secretly Helps Ukraine Fight Putin
For more than a decade, the United States has nurtured a secret intelligence partnership with Ukraine that is now critical for both countries in countering Russia.www.nytimes.com
For more than a decade, the United States has nurtured a secret intelligence partnership with Ukraine that is now critical for both countries in countering Russia. A C.I.A.-supported network of spy bases has been constructed in the past eight years that includes 12 secret locations along the Russian border.
Good question. The answer used to be that a few countries, France being the biggest, resisted purchasing any ammunition for Ukraine from outside the EU, saying the all the funds allocated needs to be spent on building up the capacity for ammunition production in the EU.What I don't understand is this. If Europe has the money and the USA the weaponry, why doesn't Europe simply put in a very large order for US weaponry and simply pass it on? Surely Congress can't block a beneficial purely commercial transaction.
The Czechs, he said, had found 500,000 rounds of 155-calibre ammunition and 300,000 rounds of 122-calibre which could be delivered in weeks if funding was secured. He did not disclose the source or say how much they would cost.
but nowFrance and other nations have resisted using European Union funds to buy ammunition outside the bloc, with Paris urging that money to be spent instead on developing the EU’s own industries.
France and the Netherlands backed a plan to buy ammunition outside Europe to get much-needed military equipment to Ukraine faster, with a proposal expected in early March.
I am not sure what your point is. Isn’t this a good thing? Apart from the way Russia can view it? It exposes the mess of US politics though, why fund all this and not supply ammo on time?
Russia needs to end its illegal occupation and return to its internationally recognised borders. Reparations can be discussed later.i can't see anything good about cia operating along the russian border and then letting russia destroy such a huge parts of ukraine territory. i was heavily criticized here 2 years ago when i said this war can be ended only with nato troops on red square. but ukrainian lives are cheaper, actually they cost nothing.
I won't ignore the report. I applaud the headline. You seem to think it some sort of scandal or something. Why should US/Ukrainian intelligence cooperation against Russian aggression be scandalous?
I think the Times is treading close to aiding the Russians by publishing this report. You can't talk around sensitive matters without risk of revealing information of use to other side.
But the Times investigation found that Mr. Putin and his advisers misread a critical dynamic. The C.I.A. didn’t push its way into Ukraine. U.S. officials were often reluctant to fully engage, fearing that Ukrainian officials could not be trusted, and worrying about provoking the Kremlin.
Yet a tight circle of Ukrainian intelligence officials assiduously courted the C.I.A. and gradually made themselves vital to the Americans. In 2015, Gen. Valeriy Kondratiuk, then Ukraine’s head of military intelligence, arrived at a meeting with the C.I.A.’s deputy station chief and without warning handed over a stack of top-secret files.
The article also makes it clear, that once again, just like in the NATO expansion story, it's actually eastern Europeran countries pulling in the U.S for their protection, rather than the pro-Russian narrative that it's actuallty the US pushing.
If we read the article you linked, it's pretty clear. first we have the 2014 events that started off the war between Russia and Ukraine, after Russia captured Crimea and then did their usual "breakaway state" invasion-in-all-but-name attack in the Donbass.what came first - in this case - is it chicken or egg.
So has the sh!thead changed his mind about humiliating Putin?Macron getting feisty over Ukraine at a meeting of EU Leaders having woken up to the threat posed by Putin .