There are no doubt some antisemites involved with Labour, but nowhere near the amount painted by the media and the Rabbi who is a supporter of Johnson and the Tory Party. This is the Johnson who insults black people and women Muslims who wear burkas. In other words he is a racist.
To follow up an unanswered question: Are Gee Vaucher and Penny Rimbaud your friends?
Jack
As far as I'm aware the Labour party is the only one currently being investigated by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which has apparently received dozens of submissions by serving Labour party members, with accusations of cover-up and explicit anti-semitism extending right up to the leader's office and to Corbyn himself. I have absolutely no doubt that the tory party has its own issues, but as yet it isn't being investigated. As to the remarks that Johnson made about black people and female Muslims and upon which so much ferocity and hot air is being directed by the left, I can only say that as unnattractive, insulting or even repulsive as they might to many seem in this age of filigree porcelain sensibilities, I note too that they have been willingly taken out of context the better to weaponise them, and that in the first (written in far off 2002) the target was the ugly 'white man's paternalism' of Tony Blair (with an incidental sideswipe at HMQ) and that in the second he was, in the context of calls to 'ban the veil', actively, even if in quite deliberately controversial terms, defending the right of Muslim women to wear whateverTF they like.
Anyway, racism is, as you know, something from which it is possible to be cured, so hopefully both BJ and JC are better now.
The context from which we seem to have drifted is MVV's bizarre submission that people who believe in the concepts of self-determination, democracy and the right to appoint and sanction the people who make our laws and spend our taxes, are unable to appreciate the arts, and my response that it is utter, incomprehensible claptrap. Like satire, for art to work, to have an effect, it needs to have a target, and that target is most commonly 'the establishment'. The best, or the most effective, art tends to come, almost by definition, from the young, hard up, and most ferociously anti-establishment. So the arts tend to be left leaning. The arts tend therefore to be more generously funded by the left. As I said, no shit Sherlock. However, and however unfortunate it may seem, their patronage (and the source, incidentally, of those generously bestowed funds) come from capital, and capital tends to be older, and further to the right.
Why are you so interested in whether or not GV and PR are really my friends? Does it seem incomprehensible to you too that someone who believes in freedom, democracy and the right to self-determination, and whose instincts are to the centre right, could possibly be acceptable to such anti-establishment heroes?