advertisement


Transports all sound the same...

I've swapped many transports through various DACs and have never heard a difference, in fact, i've rarely heard a difference between DACs to be honest. I guess i'm deaf?
 
I had a Teac P500 transport which sounded very good into my then dac, I decided to have a better master clock fitted to the Teac the result was an easily heard improvement.
 
I had a Teac P500 transport which sounded very good into my then dac, I decided to have a better master clock fitted to the Teac the result was an easily heard improvement.

I did the same with a Cambridge CXC. Upgraded clock and SPDIF interface and the improvement was also clear to me.

And the stock CXC was an even bigger improvement over an Audiolab 8200CD used as CD transport.
 
Hi Radamel. What was involved in the upgrade? Who did it? Cost?

Hi Harry,

A better master clock, an improved SPDIF interface and better vibration control.

This was done by Qualiaphysic.

I'll pm you about the cost.
 
Transports make more of a difference if the DAC doesn't use buffered reclocking (just relying on the digital receiver PLL) and doesn't use ASRC. In the case of the simpler digital inputs they respond well to correspondingly lower jitter transports.
 
Harry
Have a chat with Colin at Chevron Audio he did the upgrade on my Teac, prices are very reasonable.
If your transport and dac can be clock linked then even better.
 
I had a Teac P500 transport which sounded very good into my then dac, I decided to have a better master clock fitted to the Teac the result was an easily heard improvement.

You had two transports one modified and one standard and compared the two?
Keith
 
That's my definition too, transports can be of the computer, streamer or CD variety.

Of course. It makes sense to talk about digital transports.

Restricting the definition of digital transport to one that reads CDs is clearly outdated IMO.
 
In theory the DAC should be able to eliminate any problems from the transport. But bear in mind a DAC includes analogue circuitry, it's not just a computer. Daniel Weiss's PFM posts explain: http://www.pinkfishmedia.net/forum/showpost.php?p=2334976&postcount=580 and http://www.pinkfishmedia.net/forum/showpost.php?p=2336811&postcount=682.

Note he doesn't say it's audible! Still, these effects are real in the sense of being measureable. We should follow Daniel's example of healthy skepticism (throw in some blind listening for perspective) but without wrongly over-simplifying the matter.
 
I've swapped many transports through various DACs and have never heard a difference, in fact, i've rarely heard a difference between DACs to be honest. I guess i'm deaf?

LOL, no Cesare, that's called normality :)

Once upon a time I found this whole topic fascinating and would be busily devising a test. These days I stay well clear because I just find this stuff amusing. Not least because many will obsess over fractions of a dB difference in a particular performance parameter when it comes to modern digital audio, which in performance terms for even the cheapest stuff is lightyears better than the old analogue gear, while happily listening to gross distortion on their classic LPs through their rather wayward and oddball audiophile systems.

A general point and no slight against Frank who is usually a very sensible chap when it comes to audio.
 
That's my definition too, transports can be of the computer, streamer or CD variety.

Except the OP was about CD transports.

A transport is something that moves physical media for the purpose or reading or writing digital data. Can be tape, CD, SACD, DVD, + others.

A computer is not a transport unless you are talking about one with an internal CD/DVD drive, which may be relevant as I purchased a refurbished IBM Thinkpad for £140 to rip CDs with dBpoweramp, and it works a treat.

How much electrical noise you get from digital sources is another matter, as is how easy it is to clean it up, reclock it, or even hear the noise. That's nothing to do with transports.
 
Except the OP was about CD transports.

A transport is something that moves physical media for the purpose or reading or writing digital data. Can be tape, CD, SACD, DVD, + others.

A computer is not a transport unless you are talking about one with an internal CD/DVD drive, which may be relevant as I purchased a refurbished IBM Thinkpad for £140 to rip CDs with dBpoweramp, and it works a treat.

How much electrical noise you get from digital sources is another matter, as is how easy it is to clean it up, reclock it, or even hear the noise. That's nothing to do with transports.

What is a hard disk then?
 
Wikipedia: Transport (recording):

A transport is a device that handles a particular physical storage medium (such as magnetic tape, audio CD, CD-R, or other type of recordable media) itself, and extracts or records the information to and from the medium, to (and from) an outboard set of processing electronics that the transport is connected to.

A transport houses no electronics itself for encoding and decoding the information recorded to and from a certain format of media. It only extracts and records information to the media, as well as handling mechanical operations for accessing the media itself, such as playing or rewinding a tape, or accessing the tracks on a disc.

An example of a transport for a storage medium would be an audiophile-grade audio CD transport, which houses no D/A converter, unlike most ordinary audio CD players. Instead, the audio CD transport is connected to an external D/A converter via a coaxial (SPDIF) or optical (Toslink) digital audio connection to convert the digital audio information to analog for interfacing to most audio equipment.
 
.... get Roon, it's brilliant, and Qobuz tell me they are working on integrating it next year. I presume that's why you switched to Tidal.

Can you clarify how you know this? It's been an ongoing discussion in the Roon forums.

I've tried Tidal but the bias towards certain artists/genres is tiresome and I'd love to use Qobuz instead.

D
 


advertisement


Back
Top