A bit different to 1996 when Great Britain came 36th…
A spread of disciplines and athletes is good. A few athletes getting several medals points at too many very similar events and a small group of potential winners.A bit different to 1996 when Great Britain came 36th…
Good overview of how women have been put down, over-sexualised and infantilised by commentators during the Olympics. (it also happens a lot on pfm)
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/06/sport/olympics-sexism-women-sport-cmd-spt-intl/index.html
Keely Hodgkinson is one to watch. Gold medals are coming her way in the years ahead i think. Super talented young woman.
In the Iron Curtain days the hints that the field sports were dominated by communist doping cheats were always the excuse.Track and field (men) seems to have become our weak point, aside from the young women in the middle distances where we've some future superstars
Track and field (men) seems to have become our weak point, aside from the young women in the middle distances where we've some future superstars
Team GB did extremely well. A country of 65 million should not expect to do any better without doping. There will always be ebbs and flows in individual sports.
I saw some complaints today that it is GDP driving event choices.Interestingly, it’s usually a correlation between GDP and sporting achievement. Then population size.
I saw some complaints today that it is GDP driving event choices.
The Olympics has long been a method for the West to establish their self-identified superiority. And sport has long served as a diplomatic battleground….