As a consequence of your repatative, niave and silly contributions ,I am compelled to ask where you on the jury and now realise your mistake.
I normally wouldn't bother to reply to these comments as they are merely personal attacks but you are such an odious little gobshite I will take the time.
To recap..
what we are dealing with appears to be the rogue decision of a jury who probably convicted him on reputation and the fact he was a footballer
You posted that.
I replied..
Really?
You were there in the jury room during their deliberations?
Or is it just a decision that you disagree with?
As an aside I think that you have posted ( and reposted ) your opinion enough in this thread. If you haven't convinced people yet I suspect that it's not going to happen.
You will note that my reply contains two questions to you.
You replied..
Sorry it is facile in the extreme to take issue with the opinion you quote without dealing with All THAT AS PRECEDED IT.
have you read the thread. When you posted ,what point did you think you were making. Did it have a purpose.
Thanks for your opinion vis a vis my contribution. But if you had bothered to read the thread you will see .
A. I was the first to articulate a position away from the majority.
b. My posts are awesomely informative and have subsequently been adopted by many.
c. You have had nothing useful to say.
d your dislike of me as made you look a prat.
I do believe there is an ignore button, I normally think it is childish to use this but in your case it must surely be in your best interests
I didn't reply to any of this as it was all personally aimed at me and not the topic...however I now will.
I didn't need to deal with all that proceeded my quote as I was asking a particular and pertinent question raised by
your comment about the juries decision; namely that you thought that the jury "convicted him on reputation and the fact he was a footballer"
Q "have you read the thread. ?"
Yes I
have read the whole of this thread
very carefully.
Q. " When you posted ,what point did you think you were making.?"
When I posted I was not making a point..I was asking you a question ( which you still haven't answered)
As to your points a to d...
c, I have nothing useful to say?..you base this upon me asking you one question?
d, My dislike of you?..were on earth do you extrapolate this from? Me asking you a question?
You then posted this...
A niave distasteful attitude to sex and women which is prevelant in our culture is not deserving of a prison sentence.
I posted this..
He got a prison sentence for RAPE. Not for being distasteful.
You disagreeing with that juries opinion is neither here nor there. You were not on that jury.
Which elicited this from you...
As a consequence of your repatative, niave and silly contributions ,I am compelled to ask where you on the jury and now realise your mistake.
Repetitive?... I have posted
twice on this thread.You?...
thirty times! 10% of all the posts on here.
Niave and silly? I have quoted my posts above for all to see. I will leave this to others to judge.
No,I was not on the jury ..never hinted that I was and never made any claims to know just what this particular jury thought..unlike you.