While a very long way from being a fan of Patel, she has come out today and condemned Trump by name. I believe Hunt has too, along with Rayner and Nandy for Labour.
Most other comments have been more guarded, condemning the violence but not naming the man who created it.
Why the reticence?
And by those in turn supported by Trump, who obviously saw a brother in arms in Boris JohnsonThe more restrained comments wouldn't be from those who were broadly supportive of Agent Orange, would they?
While a very long way from being a fan of Patel, she has come out today and condemned Trump by name. I believe Hunt has too, along with Rayner and Nandy for Labour.
Most other comments have been more guarded, condemning the violence but not naming the man who created it.
Why the reticence?
More politicians need to be asked those questions. It needs to be said loud and clear by as many voices as possible that Trump is a danger to life and any reasonable definition of libertyWhat I saw was PP condemning the violence. It took repeated questions to make her connect that to Trump.
Unfortunately he is still president and can do an awful lot of damage in the 2 weeks left.They may have condemned Trump by name but not too brave really. He’s no longer President and they need to work with Biden
I haven't decided what the flag is that Michael 'Shapps' Green always has behind him. Along with the ministerial red box
Nothing wrong with a bit of innocent flag waving...I think the term is flag sh**gers.
Nothing wrong with a bit of innocent flag waving...
Yes, the world will be a better place if The Dukes of Hazzard is bannedThat flag was on the roof of the General Lee in The Dukes of Hazzard! No doubt there will be calls for it to be banned.
Hadn’t thought of that....two very good points.What about Daisy?
Hadn’t thought of that....two very good points.
That flag was on the roof of the General Lee in The Dukes of Hazzard! No doubt there will be calls for it to be banned.