Lee T
pfm Member
In a second ref
Oh Britain, what have you done (part ∞+16)?
- Thread starter zarniwoop
- Start date
- Status
Still
he said his naim was ralph
No, on pfm posting about something you claim to "have little interest" in.
Lee T
pfm Member
Little interest in a second ref, got it yet?
Still
he said his naim was ralph
You continue to post about a 2nd ref' despite claiming to 'have little interest' in one. Got it yet?
Lee T
pfm Member
I'm personally against a second ref for the reasons given earlier so i'm entitled to post on the subject & give my point of view & explain why.
I have little interest in voting come another ref.
Are we there yet?
Still
he said his naim was ralph
I agree, although doing so whilst claiming to 'have little interest' is a puzzle.
Possibly what a lil' fish might expect from a troll.
ff1d1l
pfm Member
But you have little interest in it. And you communicate your enthusiasm wonderfully well, such that many on here now have no interest in your point of view either.
Lee T
pfm Member
Read amendments, just for you.
Lee T
pfm Member
Little interest in voting (in a second ref, see the word abstain earlier) but I have interest in the parliamentary process, where a vote could lead & how it may turn out, all part of Forum discussion.
Still
he said his naim was ralph
The probability of trolling increases.
Lee T
pfm Member
Back up the wagon, the rest have since retreated.
Offering an opinion on a subject based on personal preference is not trolling, it's taking part in discussion, your posts on the other hand are nothing more than goading for effect to get a rise, in other words, the perfect definition of trolling, something you have become accustomed to since your return, why this is I have no idea.
If you want clarity see response to f11.
Still
he said his naim was ralph
Ragaman editing said:
Trolls find it very difficult to apologise when they're caught out.
Ragaman editing said:
Trolls also don't mention their their mistakes and lash out.
Ragaman further editing said:
If you want your posts to be intelligible you need to mark your edits.
Let me guess: you don't have much interest in editing posts?
Lee T
pfm Member
Caught out where exactly, see my response to Tony before you decided down this destructive path to self glory.
post 1435 explains my intention & why quite clearly, maybe read the posts before piling in with this immature nonsense.
TheDecameron
Unicorns fart glitter.
Why did it all go so wrong Treeza?
Still
he said his naim was ralph
Your inherently contradictory claim to have 'little interest'.
Sounds like something out of the Daily Stormer playbook.
Ragaman editing said:
That post is an example of your contradictory claim. Or trolling.
Lee T
pfm Member
Again, read post 1435, before you started this nonsense.
Still
he said his naim was ralph
read post 1453
Lee T
pfm Member
Keeping up this futile attempt to discredit is fruitless. my post earlier clearly stated I have no interest in voting in a second ref for the reasons given.
Have you read it yet, 1453, to Tony, before you piled in with the trolling session.
Still
he said his naim was ralph
Lee T
pfm Member
The post is actually 1435 in response to Tony's question, it explains everything I needed to say, should have stopped there.
What happened in your absence is your business but It's becoming hard to watch.
- Status