I think even if I won £20 mil on the lottery, I wouldn't buy this. What is its exact purpose, and what does it achieve that can't be achieved for a barrowload less? Surely active is the way to go - at any price?
exactly. less than 2.5% of this market would have ever visited a hifi forum, let alone contributed.One good thing, I s'pose; 552 and 500 owners shouldn't be negatively affected, as these are soooooooo far above these existing models in power, price and weight, that the 552/500 will still represent the realistic top of the tree.
Having said that, I'm sure someone will set up a six-pack for active use.
I understand it can pull a horse or two.
700W is 10dB more than 70W.seriously though, I think most folks on this forum accept that something around 70w is more than enough for most applications.
700W is 10dB more than 70W.
I imagine that there is some huge Focal that needs an in-house solution. Obviously they'd be better off with active ATCs, which effectively have similar powers combined with comprehensible cost and a striking lack of leaf springs.
Paul
Not to mention the chiropractic fees to unkink their broken backs.Pity the poor dealers having to cough up for their demo kit. And pay for the security guards when it goes out for a home demonstration!
When they call it a "statement", what exactly is the statement?
Maybe overall, but aren't some audio companies doing well? Rega, as an example, seems to be doing just fine with sensibly priced kit, while keeping production in house.Is this because the arse really has fallen out of the regular audiophile market?
Is this because the arse really has fallen out of the regular audiophile market?
We have the budget end which satisfies most folk and little interest in what sits between the extremes?
Is this because the arse really has fallen out of the regular audiophile market?
Blimey, it takes three blokes just to turn the source selector from aux to tape!
Joe