I'd be looking to try a pair of PAXO/1 crossovers, such as came with Intro I, IBL, and SBL.
OP mentioned having a pair of SBLs with PAXO/1 crossovers out on service. It would take very little effort for him to try these crossovers on these Intro II when the SBLs come back. He may still find them unsatisfactory, but at least he will have given them every opportunity to shine (less?) at no cost.I'd be looking to try a pair of OTHER SPEAKERS!! ;0)
It's mystifying the way the Naim badge on any piece of equipment prompts buyers to assume it must be a good product worthy of effort and expense to reveal its true greatness. What the heck? Look at them! Are the boxes brilliant quality? Are the drivers? They're wrapped in plastic FFS.
I'm not saying everything Naim build is crap, far from it, but they made speakers for a long time and if truth be told, they only ever were mediocre at it. Their speakers were given much more time than they really deserved simply because they were from Naim. Some were good, some were terrible and some were just ok but if another, less established, brand had put out the same speakers we would not still be taking about them today.
You can buy much better speakers than the Intro for similar money. Ones that don't need dedication and Herculean effort to get working properly. Buy some of those.
OP mentioned having a pair of SBLs with PAXO/1 crossovers out on service. It would take very little effort for him to try these crossovers on these Intro II when the SBLs come back.
I'd be looking to try a pair of OTHER SPEAKERS!! ;0)
It's mystifying the way the Naim badge on any piece of equipment prompts buyers to assume it must be a good product worthy of effort and expense to reveal its true greatness. What the heck? Look at them! Are the boxes brilliant quality? Are the drivers? They're wrapped in plastic FFS.
I'm not saying everything Naim build is crap, far from it, but they made speakers for a long time and if truth be told, they only ever were mediocre at it. Their speakers were given much more time than they really deserved simply because they were from Naim. Some were good, some were terrible and some were just ok but if another, less established, brand had put out the same speakers we would not still be taking about them today.
You can buy much better speakers than the Intro for similar money. Ones that don't need dedication and Herculean effort to get working properly. Buy some of those.
I used Intro 2s with a CD5 and Nait 5 for a few years and really enjoyed them. They bore no resemblance to the damning descriptions I’ve read so often.
15 ish years ago I was in the position to spend £5,000 on a new system and I decided on a Naim CD/Amp front end quite quickly, but choosing speakers took several months of listening to all the usual suspects that the mags/dealers were pushing then. Finding a dealer to demo Naim speakers was a challenge, but once I did it was clear very quickly that the Intro II's were what I was looking for. For the £880 price tag there were much more impressive looking options on the market, and many more options that were held in higher regard by those that voice strong opinions, but non matched the value of the Intro's in my system, in my home. I lived very happily with them for years and through source and amp upgrades, even if they were wrapped in plastic, although I'm not sure mine were.
Intro 2s are certainly not wrapped in plastic, if you're referring to the cabinets. Rather, exquisitely made wooden jobs.
I used Intros, with the outboard crossovers, from about 1997 to 2016, with CDX, 102, HiCap and 180.