And the die?
is it normal for HiFi nerds to dress so... well... drably?
So the Naim Statement is rather expensive, to the point where some of you are offended by the vulgarity of what it represents. Why that gets your knickers in a twist if you are not in the market for one is beyond my comprehension. I'm not offended by anyone wearing Patek Philippe or driving a McLaren, unless they are behaving badly. It's not as if a Naim Statement owner could take his hifi for a walk or drive to wave it about, is it?
I have seen at least one of these luxury makes having no short circuit protection "because it spoils the sound".I'd like to see a brave Statement owner short the loudspeaker terminal at full tilt...
Not sure if that is directed at me, but I'm certainly not dissing the product. It is quite likely to be exceptional. My only question is what benefit arises from having 750W per channel, when 100W is plenty for most people in a domestic situation.I am neither in the market for an amp like the Statement nor even remotely interested (and I've not heard it). But I am appalled by the number of PFMers who are willing to diss a product purely on their own (misguided) beliefs, envy or disgust without even listening to it.
How can you come to the conclusion without listening that it's not worth it or that it doesn't do something quite 'special'?
Others can speak or themselves, but Naim are marketing this equipment as their finest, and making it exclusively available to a tiny percentage of their market.
So you can have what they tout as the best hi-fi if you are stinking rich.
That sickens me, to the point that I'd never purchase one of their products again.
Even worse, such products are sold on a lie. The perfect amplifier needn't cost a fraction of this thing.
I don't divorce moral considerations from the companies I buy from or endorse.
The list got a little shorter.
Others can speak or themselves, but Naim are marketing this equipment as their finest, and making it exclusively available to a tiny percentage of their market.
So you can have what they tout as the best hi-fi if you are stinking rich.
That sickens me, to the point that I'd never purchase one of their products again.
Even worse, such products are sold on a lie. The perfect amplifier needn't cost a fraction of this thing.
I don't divorce moral considerations from the companies I buy from or endorse.
The list got a little shorter.
I am neither in the market for an amp like the Statement nor even remotely interested (and I've not heard it). But I am appalled by the number of PFMers who are willing to diss a product purely on their own (misguided) beliefs, envy or disgust without even listening to it.
How can you come to the conclusion without listening that it's not worth it or that it doesn't do something quite 'special'?
Others can speak or themselves, but Naim are marketing this equipment as their finest, and making it exclusively available to a tiny percentage of their market.
So you can have what they tout as the best hi-fi if you are stinking rich.
That sickens me, to the point that I'd never purchase one of their products again.
Even worse, such products are sold on a lie. The perfect amplifier needn't cost a fraction of this thing.
I don't divorce moral considerations from the companies I buy from or endorse.
The list got a little shorter.
I am appalled by the number of PFMers who are willing to diss a product purely on their own (misguided) beliefs, envy or disgust without even listening to it.
So the Naim Statement is rather expensive, to the point where some of you are offended by the vulgarity of what it represents. Why that gets your knickers in a twist if you are not in the market for one is beyond my comprehension. I'm not offended by anyone wearing Patek Philippe or driving a McLaren, unless they are behaving badly. It's not as if a Naim Statement owner could take his hifi for a walk or drive to wave it about, is it?
The thing that interests me about the Naim Statement is the power output. I do understand that proper dynamic range for realistic levels require considerable electrical muscle. But how many people listen that loudly? In my averagely sized room (5.8 x 4.1 x 2.7m), I struggle to hear the dynamic difference between a pair of 125W monoblocks and an ancient 30W Pioneer when playing music at my preferred listening levels. Conveniently, that's the same headroom difference between the Statement and the NAP500, which is about 6dB. But qualitatively, I much prefer the way the Pioneer sounds. Maybe it is the class-A operation, and maybe it is all in my nostalgic mind. But others who have heard the comparison share the same view that the lower-powered vintage Jap amp sounded better than the higher-powered modern Danish amp. So, I don't think power is all there is to it.
I'm unlikely to hear the Statement in my parts, and it is improbable that I'll ever buy hifi with that kind of price tag. So the Statement is irrelevant to me. However, finding the right combination of products and careful configuration of the listening environment goes a long way on the road to audio nirvanah, and much more satisfying than simply getting something that is reassuringly expensive. I don't feel remotely jealous, envious or even slightly annoyed by the Naim Statement nor the people who buy them.