It’s not a great analogy, though. It might be better if you’d said that the majority vote had gone for a programme which was difficult to sing, hard to listen to and would have put off most audiences so the future of the choir wasn’t assured. But even then, choir members are free to leave the choir if they don’t like the programme.
We, on the other hand, are obliged to stay in the choir, but can be criticised for not singing lustily along?
So I think your analogy is too cheap, too simplistic, to be applied to a much more complex situation. If you think it’s a valid analogy, I respectfully suggest you haven’t grasped the reality of the situation.