Steven Toy
Accuphase newbie
How many CD transports are there which have really been designed as CD transports either? How much thought has gone into the design of the CD player from the point of view of optimising its digital outputs? (assuming that this can make a dac sound better) And if its a real transport only solution, has it been designed as such or is it just a CDP with the dac taken out.
I can see the logic of arguing that CD players should be in one box (as naim argued for years), so that the signals are kept as I2S and the dac clock can control everything. But once you're using the SP/DIF output of your player, are you really using it as designed?
My experience has also been that enjoying listening to music has a lot to do with enjoying and feeling comfortable with what you are doing. The better the UI, the more I enjoy the whole thing. I don't think its the DAC that gets more "relaxed", "musical" or gets more "flow" and "ease".
The Apollo R still has the DAC left in. It was also designed to be partnered with the Rega DAC.
I would, however, like to get it clock locked to the MDAC.
Not all CD transports are the same of course. I have heard the difference a dCS Scarlatti transport makes over a dCS P8i used as a transport. I have also heard the Scarlatti respond to changes in what it sits on.