G
Guest432
Guest
But ebay have no right to say the buyer can keep the tonearm.
Paul
You ain't much of a lawyer.
Under international law, the law of the buyer takes precedence over the law of the seller, so UK law means nothing. Everything has to be conducted in the land of the buyer and by the courts of the buyers land.
He cannot sue ebay because they are acting as an international broker. They have broken no law. Mr biglebowski sold and thee buyer bought, all ebay do is facilitate.
The only thing Mr biglebowski can do is literally drive over, very politely knock on the buyers door and politely ask him to return the arm. If the buyer says no, the Mr biglebowski is stuffed.
Selling and buying abroad is ultra risky and this episode proves that.
Never sell abroad unless you have the wherewithal to take court action in a foreign land.
Mick
Paul
You ain't much of a lawyer.
Under international law, the law of the buyer takes precedence over the law of the seller, so UK law means nothing. Everything has to be conducted in the land of the buyer and by the courts of the buyers land.
He cannot sue ebay because they are acting as an international broker. They have broken no law. Mr biglebowski sold and thee buyer bought, all ebay do is facilitate.
The only thing Mr biglebowski can do is literally drive over, very politely knock on the buyers door and politely ask him to return the arm. If the buyer says no, the Mr biglebowski is stuffed.
Selling and buying abroad is ultra risky and this episode proves that.
Never sell abroad unless you have the wherewithal to take court action in a foreign land.
Mick
Not sure ebay are in the position to tell someone they can keep someone else's property?
eBay have made a judgement and told the buyer that they can have a refund and keep the arm. They are not just the broker but have now interfered in the process, made an incorrect judgement on a fake, and must be held to account for their taking this role in the matter.
Someone has made a false representation. If eBay wriggle more, then maybe sue the individual that made the incorrect judgement on the fake, or sue the buyer for raising a dispute on a lie.
Yes they can because the onus is now on Mr biglebowski to prove the item is not a fake. They are advising the seller to keep it, what the seller does is up to him.
International trading takes a lot of learning and the rules of natural fair play takes a back seat.
Guessing if roksan have pics of similar arm & can confirm they used to make it,it should be easy enough to get it back.
Guessing if roksan have pics of similar arm & can confirm they used to make it,it should be easy enough to get it back.
I sent them pics of other Tabriz arms without badges as part of the case. I found loads using google images.
I've emailed Tufan at Roksan asking if he could provide any evidence or failing that a statement.
The only way Roksan can verify it is genuine is for them to physically examine it, no court will accept a photograph as being conclusive evidence.
Now how does the buyer send it to Roksan, ah yes he sends it through the post and if it is indeed a fake, is open to prosecution. ebay are merely pointing this out under duty of care.
The best advice for a private citizen is to accept that foreign transactions are too risky to be worth the trouble.
Mr biglebowski has had an unfortunate experience and the cost of putting it right outweighs the cost of the arm.
He is best advised to forget about it and move on, which I agree is not pleasant.
Good starting point![]()
It is not fake until proven so, he would just be sending a tonearm back to the manufacturer for authentication.
I'm in France and Germany next week visiting our offices so may well take a detour to "visit" the buyer if he refuses to return it.