ks.234
Half way to Infinity
Methinks my condemnation of the Labour Party’s economics is what this is really about.What's wrong with you two? Thought we were on the same side.
The rest is just nonsense.
Methinks my condemnation of the Labour Party’s economics is what this is really about.What's wrong with you two? Thought we were on the same side.
I’m not left.The Left squabbles, and the Right gains ground.
Glad you enjoyed the show. I presume you’re waiting for more?It's like the Jerry Springer Show for lefties.
Prime time entertainment.![]()
Sadly, that’s exactly what’s happening.The Left squabbles, and the Right gains ground.
No. The right is not winning because the left is squabbling. The right is winning because that is where the centre is now.Sadly, that’s exactly what’s happening.
They are but this is what the CHAOS does...What's wrong with you two? Thought we were on the same side.
But they’re not, that is the point. One is neoliberal and the other is social democratic. The one was invented to declare war on the other after the horrors of the New Deal.They are but this is what the CHAOS does...
They preceded Thatcher with it so we should be used to it by now.The problem is that it is quite hard to accept that Labour are neoliberal and justify voting for them
Yes, Callaghan adopted neoliberalism when he abandoned ‘Keynesianism’, and it got him into big trouble with the IMF.As you have mentioned
They preceded Thatcher with it so we should be used to it by now.
It was Callaghan’s response to recession and a lack of dynamism in nationalised industries like Post Office Telephones.
Bullshit. I don't give two shits what you or anyone else thinks about the Labour Party. You get one vote, so do I.Methinks my condemnation of the Labour Party’s economics is what this is really about.
The rest is just nonsense.
Yes, but more specially it was Stagflation, a combination of high unemployment and inflation which the ‘Keynesian’ mathematical models said, or were interpreted to say, couldn’t happen at the same time.I see his reasoning.
*Cutbacks* became a buzzword in my industry and others. The idea being to cut out unnecessary spending.
The economy looked pretty stagnant in the 70's and he paved the way for Thatcherism.
Methinks you do protest too muchBullshit. I don't give two shits what you or anyone else thinks about the Labour Party. You get one vote, so do I.
You know what this is about, I've said so. Repeatedly. Put up or shut up. You can't or won't do either. So carry on talking shite, at least some of us find it amusing .
Methinks that you can't ever admit that you were wrong. I'll ask you once again, put up or shut up. But you can't do either, can you? Oh how that scab must itch, you just can't leave it alone.Methinks you do protest too much
Oh Christ, here you go again, repeating the same thing again and again over and over.Methinks that you can't ever admit that you were wrong. I'll ask you once again, put up or shut up. But you can't do either, can you? Oh how that scab must itch, you just can't leave it alone.
One quote proving that you'd defined your version of neoliberalism prior to this weekend, at any point over, what, the last 6 months, and I'd say "Oh right, so you did, sorry I missed that, carry on" and that would be it resolved. But you can't, because you didn't, and c an't bear to admit it, now or anytime over however many months. That really must itch. Go on, scratch it again. It's just funny now.
The neoliberals were very much for participatory democracy. They were also comfortable with modest taxes, the public good, services for the poor and social insurance. Hayek even supported basic income.
you wont get one. Hayek was opposed a basic income.citation needed