Seanm
pfm Member
Well sure, why wouldn't you? To you they're the same.Corbyn like the Tory Party has strapped himself to the mast of the SS. Brexit. I want to see him go down with with the ship just as much as I want to see the Tories go down.
Well sure, why wouldn't you? To you they're the same.Corbyn like the Tory Party has strapped himself to the mast of the SS. Brexit. I want to see him go down with with the ship just as much as I want to see the Tories go down.
I’m not denying the ‘tell’ but how does it invalidate the point? Yes, I’m puzzled, but if nobody will explain the higher reality, don’t blame me for acting out of puzzlement.I'm sorry but the "three years" is just a massive tell. Trust me, this is not the timeframe that Corbyn and his supporters are working with. You are moving in a completely different reality to theirs and this is why everything seems so puzzling.
Also, Drood didn't "contend" that a very soft Brexit would not wreck the country: that is the consensus amongst economists.
I'm referring to the voting records of those you deem 'moderate' re war, and yes, proposed investigations into the Iraq war.Two points.
1 You seem to be referring to the SNP call for an investigation of Blair to be held to account for allegedly misleading parliament over the Iraq war. That was the one that Corbyn, McDonnell and Abbott didn't even bother to turn up to vote on. What does that tell you?
2 If you are not a pacifist does that make you a warmonger?
I'm sorry but the "three years" is just a massive tell. Trust me, this is not the timeframe that Corbyn and his supporters are working with. You are moving in a completely different reality to theirs and this is why everything seems so puzzling.
Also, Drood didn't "contend" that a very soft Brexit would not wreck the country: that is the consensus amongst economists.
OK, semantics. How does this sound? "Even if you accept Sue's contention that no deal will be more damaging than many claim..."I’m not denying the ‘tell’ but how does it invalidate the point? Yes, I’m puzzled, but if nobody will explain the higher reality, don’t blame me for acting out of puzzlement.
‘Drood contends’ was shorthand; again, by taking up the semantic point, you’ve ducked the substantive one.
Smoke and mirrors, sometimes it feels like it’s all you’ve got. Sorry Sean.
American drone shot down, this could get ugly.
Strictly Brexit though. Two cheeks of the same rear end, doing a Paso Doble for the delectation of xenophobes and British Empire nostalgists. Eventually both go flat on their face over the shared hand bag. Who’ll be first?Well sure, why wouldn't you? To you they're the same.
Though not as ugly for us had ex fireplace salesman, Gavin Williams not been sacked. Iran would have sunk a couple of his ships already. They are well versed in asymmetric anti shipping tactics, especially in defending their own territorial waters.American drone shot down, this could get ugly.
The racists or the anti-racists, the demagogues or the democrats, the corporate tax cutters or the redistributors, the asset strippers or the investors? What difference can it possibly make, when both have [sobs] insulted the 12 Golden Stars?Strictly Brexit though. Two cheeks of the same rear end, doing a Paso Doble for the delectation of xenophobes and British Empire nostalgists. Eventually both go flat on their face over the shared hand bag. Who’ll be first?
American drone shot down, this could get ugly.
Exhaust ME supplies first then attend to Venezuela?Totally predictable. USA preparing ground for war. I wouldn't believe a word from a Trump led USA: those days are long gone. Why don't USA just get out of there ?
Totally predictable. USA preparing ground for war. I wouldn't believe a word from a Trump led USA: those days are long gone. Why don't USA just get out of there ?
I'm referring to the voting records of those you deem 'moderate' re war, and yes, proposed investigations into the Iraq war.
I presume Corbyn et Al didn't turn up because they knew their votes would be wasted.
That's...not what it shows.Well, that just goes to show why referring to voting records can be misleading. The world is more complex than dreamed of in your philosophy Max.
As they know he would make zero use of them, him not being a brains man and all.OK, semantics. How does this sound? "people who haven't scooped out their own brains and flung them at Corbyn.
Or “The 7even Secrets of Unsuccessful Party Leaders” (forward by Len McCluskey). Jeremy’s hit every one on the list and added a few no ones thought of before.What difference can it possibly make, when both have [sobs] insulted the 12 Golden Stars?
Gassor, check out the voting record of those you'd deem 'moderates'. Few will have missed votes on war because they'd have been keen to vote for it, as you'll see.Well, that just goes to show why referring to voting records can be misleading. The world is more complex than dreamed of in your philosophy Max.
Real moderates don't vote for wars of aggression, nor do real progressives.