Dogberry
pfm Member
At least if your pis*ed you could still order them.Brilliant news!
Try asking for Pernand-Vergelesses.
At least if your pis*ed you could still order them.Brilliant news!
I can't manage Reuilly even when I'm sober.At least if your pis*ed you could still order them.
Try asking for Pernand-Vergelesses.
How does it work? Don't know. But I do know the tastes of most of the posters here by now and weight them accordingly. He likes oak more than I do, etc. But we obviously have different ideas on what the thread is here for, and neither of us is completely right or wrong. No problem. I'm not going to get into an argument about it, there are plenty of other threads to do that on if I want. (I don't.)
wine guru it is then
Metal guru, is it u?
I'll go out an a limb here and say would that be a 3.5?Interesting wine at lunch time, from the Tejo vineyards in Portugal:
Alfrocheiro and Touriga Nacional grapes apparently... new to me. Gougoule tells me that Alfrocheiro = Baboso Negro in Spain, not that I've ever heard of that either, and that Touriga is used mostly for Port but increasingly for normal red wine.
The wine was very pleasant and a good match with our food (Karelian beef and pork stew). High alcohol content (14%). Good nose with lots of red fruit. The taste was chunky but not cloying, and well, different in a good way. The 12 months in French oak were noticeable but not overwhelming. Reasonably long finish. Overall, somewhere between a 3 and a 4 out of 5.
Like many other places, Portugal produces good wines these days but they price accordingly. At 15 to 18 euros on line, it is not cheap but maybe still reasonable value, just about. I would buy a few more if I could find them regularly, mostly for the curiosity of these 2 varieties.
I prefer to think of it as a weak 4. Or maybe a strong 3.
Parker probably started on his slippery slope to centimetric precision by intercalating a half point here and there.
The Marchbanks scale is way more nuanced than that. You left out ‘Oh, man...’Wish I had a schnoz more accurate than Yuk, Bof, Good or Wow.
Yes, he certainly shook things up and moved them along. I just don’t know how he or his people decide whether this red cab is an 88 whereas this white Sauvignon is an 87. But then that’s their business and they have the high grade schnozzle + memory for it.
Not really a fan. I get a little queasy when I see how much influence one man and his operation has...
‘2019 Jaboulet Hermitage La Chapelle is close to the 100 points from the Wine Advocate, which has initially awarded a score of 98-100 points.
‘This could potentially make the 2019 Jaboulet Hermitage La Chapelle the only fourth vintage in the series to reach the magical 3-digit number, and should this happen, it would have a major impact on the price – almost overnight.’
https://www.rarewineinvest.com/news...hands-on-2019-jaboulet-hermitage-la-chapelle/
The Marchbanks scale is way more nuanced than that. You left out ‘Oh, man...’
Looking up the recipe it calls for Vin Santo.I’ve been a Gennaro Contaldo fan-boy for years and will make a Christmas lunch based on his Italian Year book. For dessert I’m attempting his zuccotto di panettone and to complement I found a dusty old half of 2011 botrytis semillon in the bottom of the pantry. It has the potential to be very pleasant.
Weeeelll... when you see a number of French online merchants’ websites where ‘Parker! 91!’ takes up more space than the picture of the bottle, you feel there’s still a fair bit of clout there. Of course to hedge their bets they add ‘Dunnock! 90!’ and ‘Robinson! 15.5!’ If you look very carefully you can sometimes see what it is they are selling.Well RP has retired and no one will have that clout again.
The Jaboulet is £150 a bottle and maybe it was £100 so it really doesn't matter to us mortals. When they give Brun/Burn 100 points is the time to panic.
Looking up the recipe it calls for Vin Santo.
What are you making it with?