Completely agree. Some PFH Is right up there but too many misfires and a bit more gung ho without the deeper concepts/thought.
I have the Banks shelf (with one fellow genius interloper)
And the rest of them shelves
Hans Zimmer, whose music I find intrusive and noisy these days, but he reined in the noise levels here: apparently he’s a big fan of the source material (he turned down the big-budget Tenet so he could score this film), so he might have put a little more effort into doing this film than some of his more recent work.Saw Dune yesterday, thought it was a good attempt and fairly faithful to the book... It would be a tragedy if part 2 doesn't get funded.
Definitely spectacular and the soundtrack didn't annoy me, unlike most big films nowadays, even though it was noisy and discordant.
I went yesterday with my wife, who has never read the books — never heard of them, actually, and she got every bit of it, although didn’t remember any of the names exactly. She could totally see where the ideas for Star Wars came from.Not sure what I'd make of it if I wasn't familiar with the book though!
Hans Zimmer, whose music I find intrusive and noisy these days, but he reined in the noise levels here: apparently he’s a big fan of the source material (he turned down the big-budget Tenet so he could score this film), so he might have put a little more effort into doing this film than some of his more recent work.
The concept of Psychohistory is central to the story, without it there is no real substance, with it the story is brilliant. I always assumed that Asimov distilled Toynbee’s concept of the natural lifespan of civilizations as outlined/explored in his magnum opus A Study of History. From that Asimov ‘created’ the science of Psychohistory for his Foudation series.
I am surprised. I have often found anything by Hans Zimmer is full of plagiarism and OTT. He seems to be omnipresent.... he did the Bond movie too.
Such a shame Jóhann Jóhannsson is no longer with us. His music for Villeneuve's Arrival was impressive in a non-distracting way.
And what that means is that we'll probably never get a 'proper adaptation' of the books.
I doubt if a 'proper adaptation' would ever really be possible. There's just not enough dialogue/action which could be wrestled into a workable script that would tempt serious studio investment.
I agree that what we've got isn't Asimov, but even allowing for the cheesiness(?), I'm quite enjoying it.
a proper adaptation would just be two blokes in a room talking for eight hours