richardg
Admonishtrator
GoldfingerAstonishing. How that one got down safely is beyond me. Was anyone sitting in the seat next to the missing panel?
GoldfingerAstonishing. How that one got down safely is beyond me. Was anyone sitting in the seat next to the missing panel?
Goldfinger
As you command.Let that sink in.
"In 2013, over 5,580 Boeing 737s were operated by more than 342 airlines in 111 countries, which represented more than 25% of the worldwide fleet of large jet airliners"Time both Boeing and 'the authorities' stopped ****ing about and discontinued the 737.
Very much depends on what site you're using. Some give such information, others don't. So there's no guarantee you'll know, unless you specifically use a booking site that does show the information, which may not be the cheapest ticket available.Yes, the aircraft type is normally clear when booking, although it may not go into granular detail such as Max 7, 8 or 9, or NEO / CEO for Airbus. Flight Radar 24 can give more details on their schedules, usually giving the MSN although these can be subject to change depending on circumstance.
I know…"In 2013, over 5,580 Boeing 737s were operated by more than 342 airlines in 111 countries, which represented more than 25% of the worldwide fleet of large jet airliners"
"As of June 2021, there were 9,315 Boeing 737s in service"
Far more easily said than done.
![]()
Boeing 737 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Are you being serious with your opening statement?Does anybody actually believe the likes of Airbus etc don't have exactly the same attitude as Boeing?
Airbus incident list:
I get the feeling people here don't realise just how frequent "incidents" involving commercial passenger planes are.
What evidence do you have that they don't?Are you being serious with your opening statement?
I have zero loyalty to them (at the moment) but cultures can be changed, suppliers can be put right or changed, individuals can be educated, single points of failure can be sorted out.They are indicative of Boeing's 'M O', as they continually ( try to) compete with Airbus.
I'm struggling to understand your loyalty to Boeing.
I’ll see your astonishment, and raise you:Astonishing. How that one got down safely is beyond me. Was anyone sitting in the seat next to the missing panel?
Over 25 years experience, including 15 in the flight test department. I have personally grounded aircraft based on technical issues, and was never told to keep quiet, and cover up the issue.What evidence do you have that they don't?
I’ll see your astonishment, and raise you:
And that was NOT down to Boeing.
![]()
Aloha Airlines Flight 243 - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Don’t be silly. I always say to friends and family before they set off on a forrun holiday “Remember, your plane probably won’t crash n burn.Good grief. Remind me never to get on an aeroplane ever again.
I am going to get cagey to look over the plane next time i use TUIOver 25 years experience, including 15 in the flight test department. I have personally grounded aircraft based on technical issues, and was never told to keep quiet, and cover up the issue.
Shortening mechanisms on landing gear is nothing new.This morning I saw a video on my Facebook feed criticising the 737 MAX 10. Because it's 66 inches longer than the MAX 9 Boeing are having to play games with the design to prevent tail strikes. Apparently the main undercarriage legs lengthen at rotation and as a result they been re-engineered to shorten as they retract to fit into the existing undercarriage bays.
I felt it was really a knock the MAX post. However it goes some way to show how hard Boeing is working to wring everything they can out of the 737 design and flight crew qualifications.
If 15 years ago Boeing had bitten the bullet and started with a clean sheet design they probably would have and aircraft that would be better than the Airbus 320 series. Mind you if the corporate culture we have read about was still the same we could simply be looking at other design and manufacturing issues.