Good on ya! I was a guitarist in a former life. I play a scale now and then on an unplugged electric while I wait for something to print, but my virtuoso days are definitely behind me! :-/p.s. Now off for a guitar lesson.
Accuracy refers to how closely one thing correlates with another; so digital accurately records the original signal, because they closely resemble one another. Precision is essentially the number of decimal places: how far do you go to describe something.Could you please clarify for me what in your mind the distinction is between precision and accuracy? know we've been here before; I just can't recall what the argument was.
If you ask them, I don't think even the manufacturers would claim any differences in clock accuracy would be more than faintly detectable by a super golden eared, very young, trained listener, with an extremely familiar killer sample, played very very loud, through ultra high quality active monitors.Despite all the theoretical knowledge you think you may have, have you ever actually listened to an Esoteric setup with external Master Clock vs internal Master clock?
Accuracy refers to how closely one thing correlates with another; so digital accurately records the original signal, because they closely resemble one another. Precision is essentially the number of decimal places: how far do you go to describe something.
Accuracy is fidelity of representation, precision is where you start rounding up. If you know better...You're wrong.
I think this is a good explanation. Of course context matters.Accuracy refers to how closely one thing correlates with another; so digital accurately records the original signal, because they closely resemble one another. Precision is essentially the number of decimal places: how far do you go to describe something.
I think this is a good explanation. Of course context matters.
www.dspguide.com/ch2/7.htm
I didn't say you were wrong. Radamel did (which makes you presumptively right) I just think the dspguide is a good explanation, possibly more accurate, or was it precise?.Thanks, but why am I wrong? Accuracy is how closely your measurement correlates with (or represents) reality, i.e., what you're measuring; precision is best thought of as a margin of error. If you have a big margin of error, i.e. poor accuracy, then use fewer decimal places because more would be meaningless, if you have high accuracy, then report more decimal places because they are meaningful.
An atomic clock that runs a minute fast is not accurate but it's extremely precise.
Joe
Nice, but in this context, i.e. digital audio, accuracy is a given, but some people think they can hear the precision....
Hammer,
Because of the *precision* with which it measures time.
Joe
I didn't say you were wrong. Radamel did (which makes you presumptively right) I just think the dspguide is a good explanation, possibly more accurate, or was it precise?.
Esoteric make good product. I have their phono stage. However they have moved distributor from Symmetry (very good) to Onkyo - a massive conglomerate. I would have questions re: their after sales support and suggest the OP checks it out thoroughly.
No. All DACs recreate the original signal accurately; I can't see even the battiest audiophile disagreeing with that. Some DACs might do so to more precision than others, but precision = decimal places = dB = audibility. The disagreements, if you like, between one DAC and another, will be many decimal places down, many dB down from full scale, thus very quiet, and therefore hard to hear.You really don't get it, do you?
When 320aac or 320mp3 trips up, the difference from the original wav becomes very large. The clever part of a lossy encoder is deciding what to discard, rarely the encoder software gets this totally wrong. Harpsichord and castanet recordings were notorious for finding these corner casesI am in no position to do a null test on say 320 vs flac. But if it was done, there would be differences.