Sue Pertwee-Tyr
Accuphase all the way down
What you’ve never had you never miss, I suppose.,
I type UK news into Google most more mornings. I got click baited by the title, wondering how on earth can people with manual cars be seen as smug. Luckily I have an ad blocker so there was nothing to be made here. Moved on!Paid by the paragraph journo turns out 1500 words in 10 minutes on demand to fill a small editorial column, then carries on with the next job. Move on. Nothing to see here.
Also, driving a manual requires you to be more aware of the vehicle, engine speed and so-on. This means you are more likely to be engaged with the actual task of, you know, driving. Which means you are more likely to be more alert and aware of your situation. Which makes you safer. Cars which automate everything, are quieter and more isolated from the external environment, and offer high levels of passive safety, just allow the driver to disengage more from the task at hand.But she's right, I am smug about my gear changing skillz. What can I say? It gives me a kick to make a seamless constant-throttle downchange or crowbarring in a pointless double-declutch for no reason.
But the availability of manual boxes will become more and more niche, as manufacturers phase them out completely.
This is driven by market preference for autos, combined with more control of the engine/transmission for emissions testing, leading to it not being worth our while guv, to develop and certify a manual version.
I've never driven a car with a manual transmission, and I probably never will. I don't see the point. I also enjoy other decades-old automotive technologies like power steering, ABS, power windows, and automatic cruise control.
Also, driving a manual requires you to be more aware of the vehicle, engine speed and so-on. This means you are more likely to be engaged with the actual task of, you know, driving. Which means you are more likely to be more alert and aware of your situation. Which makes you safer. Cars which automate everything, are quieter and more isolated from the external environment, and offer high levels of passive safety, just allow the driver to disengage more from the task at hand.
Manuals and automatics both have their place. Context is everything. In a rush hour commute, or on a congested motorway, an automatic is much less physically annoying than constantly having to work the clutch, and is generally more relaxing to drive. But a manual, on a good road, in the right circumstances, can be great fun and the automatic won't provide anything close to that.
The UK has a peculiar dislike of autos.That's interesting, I assume you not in the UK then. In the UK it is still rare for a small learner car to be available as an auto. In fact my daughters best friend really struggled getting to grips with a manual change and did the auto test and the choice of suitable small cars is very limited or expensive.
When I was learning to drive in the very early 80's auto was almost unheard of except for massive luxury cars.
Spot-on.
As for the renowned ZF auto in a BMW as someone posted above...hmmmm.. generally very good, but it'll still be in the wrong gear as you enter a bend, and even with less than spirited driving, when you ask for a little power you end up with a slightly lurched down-change, at just the wrong moment. It just ain't perfect. Yes it wafts along nicely and for 90% of the time it's great. But that 10% of time it's better taken over on the paddles... grrrrr . If I bought another one, I'd be seriously split over whether to have the ZF auto again, or a manual if it's available.
Spot-on.
As for the renowned ZF auto in a BMW as someone posted above...hmmmm.. generally very good, but it'll still be in the wrong gear as you enter a bend, and even with less than spirited driving, when you ask for a little power you end up with a slightly lurched down-change, at just the wrong moment. It just ain't perfect. Yes it wafts along nicely and for 90% of the time it's great. But that 10% of time it's better taken over on the paddles... grrrrr . If I bought another one, I'd be seriously split over whether to have the ZF auto again, or a manual if it's available.
There are a lot of Electric Learners in Milton Keynes now. Then again we have as many chargers as roundabouts and it must save a fortune in fuel bills.That's interesting, I assume you not in the UK then. In the UK it is still rare for a small learner car to be available as an auto. In fact my daughters best friend really struggled getting to grips with a manual change and did the auto test and the choice of suitable small cars is very limited or expensive.
I haven't read it entirely, but I agree. The manual evangelists all believe being able to change gears themselves makes them better drivers than people who prefer automatics. Which is of course total nonsense. Being a good driver is about a hell of a lot more than just being able to change a gear with a lever. But manual lovers will rant on about it endlessly. If it brings you some form of enjoyment fine, but don't go telling people it makes you a better driver as so many are prone to doing.Who will miss the manual car when it’s gone? Only the very smuggest drivers | Zoe Williams
We’re falling out of love with manual cars, says the DVLA. What will driving ‘enthusiasts’ have left to feel superior about now? asks Guardian columnist Zoe Williamswww.google.com
Anyone ever read such drivel as this about cars?
You don't watch much in the way of youtube car reviews do you? If you did, you'd realise just how often people bang on about not having a manual option in a model or when they review a manual how much better the car is because of it. Then there's car forums that are just full of people who'll very happily tell you you can't drive if you can't drive a manual.This is what passes for "journalism" these days. Something to read that makes no sense, is not informative at all, but keeps the reader busy for a few minutes. Completely pointless. And that patronising crap about someone's "identity" being linked to being able to change gears. Utter drivel.