Seeker_UK
Feelin' nearly faded as my jeans
That link doesn't work.
Still works for me and it's a bog-standard Twitter link so not sure what the problem is.That link doesn't work.
Still works for me and it's a bog-standard Twitter link so not sure what the problem is.
It's a clip of a Grenfell Tower manager saying she "binned" her notebooks even though she knew a public inquiry was underway.
There is a criminal investigation which has yet to conclude - as does this Inquiry.
Reports tonight of people trapped in unsaleable properties .. not necessarily high rise, which are clad with these materials..and some Tory Peer deciding these folks must contribute to the cost of removal/replacement. Typical ****ing Tory. Make the victim pay.
The people who installed this shit knew what they were doing and if they didn't they were criminally negligent. Eitherway, the builders/developers are obviously responsible.
Makes me seethe!!
Criminal charges can only follow if there is clear line of culpability. Otherwise there is no chance of conviction and even more time and effort is just wasted. That line of culpability may (only may) come out of the enquiry, which is clearly quite complicated.
I think it is only complicated by shed loads of lawyers, insurers an other vested interests lining up to obfuscate, defend the indefensible, shift blame, etc.
Who made the product, who tested the product, who approved the product for use in context, who certified building methods, who accepted/signed off the construction. All of that is known.
It is also both known AND obvious that the innocent in all of this are the victims of Grenfell, and those who are now landed with unsaleable properties or stuck in potetially unsafe rentals. In the case of the latter, builders, speculators, those who surveyed properties in relation to mortgages, rental landlords etc.,etc.. are all responsible. Why shoud the victim pay a penny?
This sort of shit is repeated endlessly in this country, in one context or another. The big money always contrives to manipulate the Govt. and the Law, to protect its own interests and the 'little guy' can just go whistle. Makes me sick.
Presumably they just ignored compliance in a limited and specific way?Truly shocked by this admission :- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-cladding-abused-testing-regimes-inquiry-told
It says that "Celotex, which made the bulk of the combustible foam insulation used, displayed a “widespread culture … of ignoring compliance”, which included distorting a full-scale fire test of its materials, the inquiry heard."
Is "ignoring compliance" the same as breaking the law, anyone ?
CHE
Is "ignoring compliance" the same as breaking the law, anyone ?