Most of the vitriol seems to come from the trade members, doesn't it? Wonder why?
Maybe they have tried to pick one up? Lot of bad backs in the industry. Or they've tried to sell Ovators and NVi's...
Most of the vitriol seems to come from the trade members, doesn't it? Wonder why?
People take this stuff very personally, are people just as personal about fridges, cookers and washing machines (and yes my cooker is more expensive than my HiFi)
That's an impossible task!Maybe they have tried to pick one up? Lot of bad backs in the industry. Or they've tried to sell Ovators and NVi's...
.....(and yes my cooker is more expensive than my HiFi)
So, let me get your position completely straight, because I'm obviously a bit fuzzy on this.
You were perfectly happy to recommend (and borrow - free of charge - for your National Audio Show demonstration, IIRC) Naim Audio equipment when the top of the company's tree only cost as much as a Porsche Cayman. But now that the top of the tree costs as much as a top AMG Mercedes S-Class, suddenly its products are to be airbrushed from your history. Is that your position? If it is, this Audio Lazarus role you've cast yourself in doesn't look quite so robust, does it?
For my part, the products sold to those with considerably more (or for that matter, considerably less) wealth than I do not matter to me. What matters instead is that the products I can afford perform their function well, and should I want a roadmap to what I consider 'better', that those products are within reach and achieve what I consider 'better'. My role as reviewer in some respects is to cast myself in the role of that someone with considerably more or less disposable income, to see how any given product fits into that potential person's audio experience.
The fact there is a layer of products that are an order of magnitude further up the pipeline that someone may probably never afford, never justify, and may not be able to justify even if they could afford simply doesn't figure. If it has any figuring in the decision-making process, it would be that there might be some aspects of the top-line performance trickling down to the equipment they can afford. That should be all that counts, not some attempt at political grandstanding. However, I doubt you can see the logic of this argument, because it must be hard to read it sitting atop your high horse.
So at what level of pricing would this trend become ridiculous? Should Naim charge, say, £300,000? Would that be 'something positive and beneficial'? Or maybe £500,00?
And, once again, Naim is not a British firm and hasn't been for some time; the profits go to a bunch of international venture capitalists. They will do to the firm whatever makes them most cash, quickly..then sell it on. That's what venture capitalists do. It's their job.
So at what level of pricing would this trend become ridiculous? Should Naim charge, say, £300,000? Would that be 'something positive and beneficial'? Or maybe £500,00?.
So at what level of pricing would this trend become ridiculous? Should Naim charge, say, £300,000? Would that be 'something positive and beneficial'? Or maybe £500,00?
And, once again, Naim is not a British firm and hasn't been for some time; the profits go to a bunch of international venture capitalists. They will do to the firm whatever makes them most cash, quickly..then sell it on. That's what venture capitalists do. It's their job.
Also we have the auto 5% price increase as well i suppose, or whatever inflation is on planet Salisbury
Ugly bugger too ain't it.