It was a different time.
Not in Thailand they aren't. You are in favour of direct action against civil right abuses and go to live in a country which sees you imprisoned and tortured for just criticising the military dictatorship. What kind of morality allows you do that?So intelligent people are still involved in militant groups and taking direct action against those associated (however loosely) with civil rights abuses.
In 2013 the Teachers Union Of Ireland passed a motion calling for an academic boycott of Israel. In January 2016, 168 Italian academics and researchers published a call to boycott Israeli academic institutions. Can you really sit there and refer to these people as unintelligent? Would you not agree that the boycotts are sweeping?
Thanks vuk, I look forward to reading your thoughts. The convergence of some on the Left with the tactics (if not the aims) of the far Right has disturbed me so a lot of what I wrote was me thinking aloud, trying to make sense of it, and my own beliefs. It's good therapy, if nothing else!drood.
i am really enjoying the new essay-style postings from you and other people over the past couple of weeks. i feel glad to be part of this twitter counter-revolution. i need to get back to PsB first and will then comment on some of what you've written. as may have noticed in another thread, i have had a profound religious experience over the weekend and need to get my act together, catch up with work, etc.
cheers.
I’d argue they were dumb compared to someone like say Daniel Barrenboim who crosses divides to bring intellegent like-minded people together. His East West Divan Orchestra mixes Palestinians, Jews and Arabs to wonderful effect and is a whole different intellectual ballpark to your bigoted take on a ‘No blacks, No Irish, No dogs’ poster.
Cheers Max. If you're argument is that the Democrats need to get their own house in order you won't find much disagreement here. I just think progressives should not be "assisting" Trump and his far-right supporters in the meantime. Put another way, it's possible to both push for the reform of the Democrat Party and fight Trump with everything we have.Drood, that's another very good post for the most part, IMO. My response to it and your previous one won't be anywhere near as well written but I'll give it a bash. It may not appear for a few days though as I'm kinda busy at the moment and I'll need a few hours at least to devote to it. We're talking a scientist vs a lorry driver here. This stuff is harder work for me
P.S. What I would say in the meantime is it might be worth considering that you've devoted many paragraphs of text to Trump, the investigation, the deep state (good points too), the progressive angle wrt it all etc, but only a short sentence in closing on the future of the Democratic Party.
My response will be much more focused on the latter, as I think it's very important in the grand scheme of things, it *currently being the only vehicle that can realistically remove Trump, weaken the deep state/media, and provide real change.
*There's much talk of forming a third party in some circles, but only talk at this point.
Later.
My problem with the phrase "deep state" is that, whatever minimal meaning it had in the first place, in practice it means the paranoid, delusions of the alt-right and Fox news. I think mostly other people use the phrase as they like the sound of the words -- it's undeniably satisfying to say -- and I generally take it as a sign of something along the spectrum that goes from uncritical thinking to conspiracy theory nutjob.
It's certainly so overloaded and useful to the far right and this administration that careful speakers avoid using it.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/13/donald-trump-white-house-steve-bannon-rich-higgins
PS Note in the above how Bannon and associates sound like the crazy left (as distinct from the intellectual and/or radical left).
finally. who the **** is Daniel wasisname? the fact that just about no one I know has ever heard of him ( and of course that Jewish attitudes are as extreme as ever) shows the efficacy of his protests.
finally. who the **** is Daniel wasisname? the fact that just about no one I know has ever heard of him ( and of course that Jewish attitudes are as extreme as ever) shows the efficacy of his protests.
PS Just out of interest would you throw black or Asian Americans out of your bar? I’m curious as to how consistent your bigotry is!
tony.
quite frankly, i CAN NOT understand why this has not caused people to behead their politicians. not only are both men sexual abusers, but we are in the midst of a massive cultural frenzy about this sort of thing! i just don't get it -- actually, maybe i do: the media are not connecting the dots forcefully enough.
The large number of people coming forward is part of a movement to make it unacceptable for sexual harassment to take place, once it's generally accepted, then Trump can be brought to justice, I notice Nikki Haley, US ambassador to the UN has recently spoken out that Trump's accusers should be heard.